Abstract
The study analyzed the present land covers that have taken place in the catchment and its effect on the hydrological responses of the catchment. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT2009) model was used to investigate the impact of land cover change on hydrological responses of the study area. Sensitivity analysis result shown SCN curve number (CN), Soil Evaporation Compensation Factor (ESCO), Soil Depth (m) (Sol_Z), Threshold water depth in the shallow aquifer for flow (GWQMN), Base flow alpha factor (Alpha_Bf), (REVAPMN) and Soil Available Water Capacity (SOL_AWC) were found the most influential parameters affecting flow and USLE equation support practice (USLE_P), Linear parameter for maximum sediment yield (SPCON), Exponential parameter for maximum sediment yield in channel sediment routing (SPEXP), Cropping practice factor (USLE_C), channel cover factor (CH_COV1), channel erodiability factor (CH_ERODMO) were the most sensitive parameters affecting sediment yield of the catchment respectively. Scenarios were developed to analyze the impact of land use/cover changes to the hydrological regime. Base scenario: current land use practices has cultivated land, grass land, shrub and bush land, forest land, built up area and water body, scenario1: shrub and bush lands completely changed to forest land and scenario2: Grass land changed to cultivated land. The result for different land use scenarios show that: conversion of shrub land to forest area reduced surface runoff, reduced the amount of sediment transported out and increase base flow but conversion of grass land in to cultivated land areas increased surface runoff during wet seasons and reduced base flow during the dry seasons and also as the peak flow increases it is suspected of carrying more sediment.
Highlights
As a result of the loss of natural vegetation and the fragmentation or separation of natural areas, land use land cover change (LULCC) may be a major threat to biodiversity [1]
These strategies and tools will provide knowledge that can be used at the watershed level for water resource management and encourage local government officials to prepare the Solomon Bogale: Hydrological Response to Land Use and Land Cover Changes of Ribb Watershed, Ethiopia potential problem solving initiative for appropriate action through future growth progress [6]
The SWAT model involves the formation of Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs), which are the specific combinations within each sub-basin of land use, soil and slop type shown in figure 6 below
Summary
As a result of the loss of natural vegetation and the fragmentation or separation of natural areas, land use land cover change (LULCC) may be a major threat to biodiversity [1]. The SWAT model involves the formation of Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs), which are the specific combinations within each sub-basin of land use, soil and slop type shown in figure 6 below.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
