Abstract
Conceptual uncertainty is considered one of the major sources of uncertainty in groundwater flow modelling. In this regard, hypothesis testing is essential to increase system understanding by refuting alternative conceptual models. Often a stepwise approach, with respect to complexity, is promoted but hypothesis testing of simple groundwater models is rarely applied. We present an approach to model-based Bayesian hypothesis testing in a simple groundwater balance model, which involves optimization of a model in function of both parameter values and conceptual model through trans-dimensional sampling. We apply the methodology to the Wildman River area, Northern Territory, Australia, where we set up 32 different conceptual models. A factorial approach to conceptual model development allows for direct attribution of differences in performance to individual uncertain components of the conceptual model. The method provides a screening tool for prioritizing research efforts while also giving more confidence to the predicted water balance compared to a deterministic water balance solution. We show that the testing of alternative conceptual models can be done efficiently with a simple additive and linear groundwater balance model and is best done relatively early in the groundwater modelling workflow.
Highlights
The conceptualization of a groundwater flow problem is considered one of the major sources of uncertainty in groundwater flow modelling [1,2]
The question we ask of the hypothesis testing exercise is framed by the model development approach
We presented an approach to model-based Bayesian hypothesis testing in a simple additive groundwater balance model, which involves optimization of a model in function of both parameter values and a conceptual model
Summary
The conceptualization of a groundwater flow problem is considered one of the major sources of uncertainty in groundwater flow modelling [1,2]. Conceptual uncertainty stems from the fact that the available data more often than not will fit more than one conceptual understanding [3]. When dealing with conceptual uncertainty, hypothesis testing is essential to increase system understanding by refuting alternative conceptual models [4]. The question we ask of the hypothesis testing exercise is framed by the model development approach. Individual conceptual hypotheses cannot be tested through model-based hypothesis testing; only collections of hypotheses can be tested [5,6]. If a hypothesis cannot be falsified in a model, it is only conditionally validated given the assumptions in other parts of the model
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have