Abstract

AbstractApart from the important trans‐dihydrido‐transition metal catalysts containing polydentate phosphine, diamine or pincer‐type ligands, the catalytic role of trans‐dihydride complexes with monodentate ligands is generally neglected given their inferior thermodynamic stability compared to the cis isomers. This way however, a mechanistic investigation about selectivity loses important details as more prominent catalysts provide multiple competing pathways towards the desired product. Here, we used the hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde as model reaction to gain theoretical insight about whether the water soluble ruthenium trans‐dihydride complexes, trans‐[Ru(II)H2P3L] (P=PPh3 in the model, monosulfonated PPh3 (mtppms) in experiments, L=H2O or P), are, indeed, feasible catalytic species as suggested on the basis of experimental investigations. After evaluating numerous catalytic cycles, we found that the consideration of thermodynamically accessible trans‐dihydrides provides two viable competing reaction channels. The key feature of the mechanisms is the inclusion of explicit solvent (water) molecules, which allows the separation of substrate hydrogenation from the rate determining catalyst regeneration, where the H−H activation occurs. We found that the former determines the selectivity towards carbonyl hydrogenation through the more favorable hydride transfer to the carbonyl carbon.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.