Abstract
Hybridization with local search (LS) is known to enhance the performance of genetic algorithms (GA) in single objective optimization and have also been studied in the multiobjective combinatorial optimization literature. In most such studies, is applied to the solutions of each generation of GA, which is the scheme called with LS herein. Another scheme, in which is applied to the solutions obtained with GA, has also been studied, which is called then LS herein. It seems there is no consensus in the literature as to which scheme is better, let alone the reasoning for it. The situation in the multiobjective function optimization literature is even more unclear since the number of such studies in the field has been small.This paper, assuming that objective functions are differentiable, reveals the reasons why GA is not suitable for obtaining solutions of high precision, thereby justifying hybridization of GA and LS. It also suggests that the hybridization scheme which maximally exploits both GA and is GA then LS. Experiments conducted on many benchmark problems verified our claims.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.