Hybrid strengthening scheme for reinforced concrete beams: Flexural behaviour and large-scale testing

Abstract

Revision of design standards, new regulations, and planned/unplanned increases in loadings potentially make buildings vulnerable to changes in capacity demands. This may result in some structural components of an existing structure requiring strength or stiffness improvement. Strengthening of capacity deficit members is widely recognised as the preferred and sustainable choice in terms of conserving resources and minimising the carbon footprint. Strengthening techniques such as Reinforced Concrete (RC) jacketing, steel jacketing and Fibre Reinforced Polymer (FRP) wrapping have been explored and widely used. However, when adopted solely, each scheme has its drawbacks. RC jacketing results in a considerable rise in the dead load, influencing the loading on the foundation and restricting the functional space available post-jacketing. Steel jacketing often lacks flexibility as a significant effort is required for installation. FRP improves the flexural strength response but produces low stiffness enhancement and lesser ductility. A hybrid strengthening option, i.e. a combination of the above strengthening methods, presents a viable option to address the limitations cost-effectively. This paper presents a pioneering attempt focused on improving the flexural performance of RC beams using a hybrid strengthening scheme comprising of RC jacketing and FRP. Four large-scale RC beams were prepared, and three of them were strengthened. The first was strengthened by RC jacketing, the second by a combination of RC jacketing and flexural FRP, and the last by the combination of RC jacketing, flexural FRP and FRP ‘U wrap’ in the shear zones. The specimens were tested using the four-point bending test. The flexural behaviour was assessed in terms of the peak moment capacity, flexural stiffness, load-displacement response, crack pattern and failure modes. The test results confirmed that hybrid strengthening leads to strength gain and stiffness gains of 105% and 90% respectively, as compared with the unstrengthened beam. The efficacy of the theoretically predicted strengths against the test strengths is assessed.