Abstract
The literature on logics takes for granted that in a same organization, hybriditization or combination is the result of several independent logics. Moreover, it shows that those independent logics are only focused on one unique institutional field. In this paper, we attempt to show that a given independent logic encompasses already in its roots, a pre-existing logic or a minor logic, which may or may not be expressed. From an inductive in-depth case study in a social integration enterprise (SIE) in France, which combines both a social welfare and a commercial logic, we show through a practice lens how hybridization of social welfare and commercial logics will impact practice variation of recruitment. We found that in same hybrid logic, when social welfare logic is higher, the SIE tends to recruit people with more extensive social problems, whereas when commercial logic increases, good physical and mental conditions are more accepted despite societal troubles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.