Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to offer an alternative understanding of media—policy relations or the ‘CNN effect’ to that which has dominated existing political science approaches. In doing so, we show how our alternative ethnomethodological approach can shed more light on the original matter of concern. Hence, before we analyse media events, we must take a step back into sociological method. Through our ethnomethodological analysis of one case study — Fox News’ coverage of Hurricane Katrina — we examine how the television coverage was achieved. We explore the televisual construction of the event. It becomes clear how messy the coverage is, and therefore how any attempt to map out causal relations between ontologically discrete units, ‘media coverage’ and ‘policy decisions’, is problematic. In addition, we suggest that this messy, chaotic coverage creates uncertainty about what was happening and that terror was amplified by Fox News offering representations of connections between Hurricane Katrina and terrorism, economic insecurity, and health hazards.KeywordsForeign PolicyMedia CoverageTelevision NewsNews EventSplit ScreenThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.