Abstract

Animals receive anti-predator benefits from social behavior. As part of a group, individuals spend less time being vigilant, and vigilance decreases with increasing group size. This phenomenon, called “the many-eyes effect”, together with the “encounter dilution effect”, is considered among the most important factors determining individual vigilance behavior. However, in addition to group size, other social and environmental factors also influence the degree of vigilance, including disturbance from human activities. In our study, we examined vigilance behavior of Khulans (Equus hemionus) in the Xinjiang Province in western China to test whether and how human disturbance and group size affect vigilance. According to our results, Khulan showed a negative correlation between group size and the percentage time spent vigilant, although this negative correlation depended on the groups’ disturbance level. Khulan in the more disturbed area had a dampened benefit from increases in group size, compared to those in the undisturbed core areas. Provision of continuous areas of high-quality habitat for Khulans will allow them to form larger undisturbed aggregations and to gain foraging benefits through reduced individual vigilance, as well as anti-predator benefits through increased probability of predator detection.

Highlights

  • Animals often scan their surroundings when foraging to assess the potential predation risk

  • This study was conducted in the Kalamaili Mountain Ungulate Nature Reserve (KNR) (44°36046°000N, 88°300-90°030E), located in the eastern part of Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, China (Fig 1)

  • The results indicated that the group size effect breaks down when there is increased disturbance in the buffer zones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals often scan their surroundings when foraging to assess the potential predation risk. Individuals in larger groups can spend more time on other fitness-enhancing activities such as foraging [4]. This phenomenon is called “the group size effect” [5]. Research on human disturbance has begun to consider nonlethal disturbance from human activities as analogous to predation risk [8,9].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.