Abstract

Abstract In this article, I examine Hrabanus Maurus’ exegesis of the opening verses of 1 Maccabees, which preserves a concise account of Alexander the Great’s career. My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees. To this end, I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text. I argue that Hrabanus turned the negative Maccabean narrative of Alexander into a positive representation that was attractive to contemporary readers. I support this argument by focusing on Hrabanus’ recourse to Latin sources, primarily the late antique authors Jerome, Orosius, and Justin, an epitomist of Roman history. I find that Hrabanus challenged Jerome’s interpretations, neutralized much of Orosius’ negative appraisal of Alexander, and amplified the laudatory passages of Justin, which generated a new image of the ancient king. The present article thus contributes to three fields: medieval exegesis of biblical texts, Carolingian reinterpretation of the patristic heritage, and the reception of Alexander the Great.

Highlights

  • The first modern biography of Alexander appeared in 1665, offering an account of both the Macedonian king and the Frankish Emperor, Charlemagne (748–814).[4]

  • My main goal is to demonstrate how Hrabanus reinterpreted the representation of the Macedonian king from 1 Maccabees

  • I employ transformation theory, which enables me to analyze the ways in which Hrabanus updated the meaning of the biblical text

Read more

Summary

Prelude

Miriam De Cock, the prime mover behind this special issue of Open Theology, invited contributors to reflect on how and why we conduct research into the “reception history”[1] of biblical and patristic heritage. My perspective on this task differs from that of many other contributors, since my training lies in Classics. The narrow sense of “literature” is problematic because literary “quality” reflects a deliberate choice of textual priority based on taste at a particular moment in time, as well as an implicit and subjective validation of the texts in question.

Introduction
Methodology
Hasmonean historiography on Alexander as the rise of evil
Alexander reloaded
Overview
Hrabanus’ revision of the Maccabean Alexander
Reuse of text from 1 Maccabees
The recourse to sources in Hrabanus’ account of Alexander “history”
Case A
Case B
Case C
Conclusion: A Carolingian Alexander?
Postlude
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call