Abstract

We extend our existing hp-finite element framework for non-conducting magnetic fluids (Jin et al., 2014) to the treatment of conducting magnetic fluids including magnetostriction effects in both two- and three-dimensions. In particular, we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first computational treatment of magnetostrictive effects in conducting fluids. We propose a consistent linearisation of the coupled system of non-linear equations and solve the resulting discretised equations by means of the Newton–Raphson algorithm. Our treatment allows the simulation of complex flow problems, with non-homogeneous permeability and conductivity, and, apart from benchmarking against established analytical solutions for problems with homogeneous material parameters, we present a series of simulations of multiphase flows in two- and three-dimensions to show the predicative capability of the approach as well as the importance of including these effects.

Highlights

  • Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) studies the behaviour of electrically conducting fluids under the existence of a magnetic field [6,15,30]

  • When considering problems with different fluid phases [16,41], as well as problems where the induced strain rate alters the distribution of 1⁄21⁄2l, which in turn changes the magnetic field distribution, magnetostrictive effects become important [26,27]

  • D [ @ XN and, in general we do not require that @ X 1⁄4 @ X or @ X 1⁄4 @ X The difference between the homogeneous isotropic conducting fluid and a magnetostrictive conducting fluid is that, the Neumann boundary for the fluid domain contains the total stress tensor, which is more realistic at describing the actual physics since, in real experiments, terms making up the contributions to the applied traction cannot be identified separately

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) studies the behaviour of electrically conducting fluids under the existence of a magnetic field [6,15,30]. When considering problems with different fluid phases [16,41], as well as problems where the induced strain rate alters the distribution of 1⁄21⁄2l, which in turn changes the magnetic field distribution, magnetostrictive effects become important [26,27] In order to include magnetostrictive effects with ease, it makes sense to revisit the governing equations for MHD and instead express the ponderomotive force f EM in terms of the divergence of a stress tensor 1⁄21⁄2rEM f EM 1⁄4 r 1⁄21⁄2rEM ; ð5Þ which, in turn, permits more general coupling mechanisms to be considered.

MHD for magnetostrictive conducting fluids
The linearised schemes
MHD for homogeneous isotropic conducting fluids
Wð0Þ Z Yð0Þ X such that
Ep edges E2E h
Fp faces F2F h
Homogeneous isotropic conducting fluids
Numerical examples
Linearised L-shape domain smooth problem
Conducting magnetostrictive fluids n
Linearised L-shape domain singular problem
Fully coupled non-linear square domain smooth problem
The two-dimensional Hartmann flow problem
Two-dimensional duct flow with cylinder shaped different media inside
Three-dimensional problems
The three-dimensional lid-driven cavity problem
The three-dimensional Hartmann flow problem
The three dimensional multi-phase MHD flow problem
Conclusions
Methods
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.