Abstract
ABSTRACTWhen an exam consists, in whole or in part, of constructed response items, it is a common practice to allow the examinee to choose among a variety of questions. This procedure is usually adopted so that the limited number of items that can be completed in the allotted time does not unfairly affect the examinee. This results in the de facto administration of several different test forms, where the exact structure of any particular form is determined by the examinee. When different forms are administered, a canon of good testing practice requires that those forms be equated to adjust for differences in their difficulty. When the items are chosen by the examinee traditional equating procedures do not strictly apply. In this paper we explore how one might equate within an IRT framework. We illustrate our procedure with data from the College Board's Advanced Placement Test in Chemistry.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
