Abstract
ABSTRACT This article considers what various forms of unknowing make possible in Shirley Jackson’s novel We Have Always Lived in the Castle. Combining Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s concept of the “privilege of unknowing” with close reading, I show how Merricat Blackwood, the novel’s narrator-protagonist, has a habit of repelling knowledge in her narration. I argue that this tendency allows her to evade accountability for the murders she committed as a child. Furthermore, I point to the queer potential of the narrator’s unknowingness, as she also circumvents gender norms and compulsory heterosexuality. The narrator’s refusal to recognize her own transgressions ultimately means that her subversion can linger beyond the narrative conclusion. Overall, I demonstrate that reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle with an emphasis on what Sedgwick terms the “privilege of unknowing” can help us understand how the novel generates readerly sympathy for or identification with its narrator, despite her murderous acts.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.