How to explore automic dysfunction on clinical practice?

Abstract

Objectives Various validated clinical scales and questionnaires are available and many neurophysiological and functional tests have been developed to evaluate dysautonomia. This work aims to review the neurophysiological tools that can be used to characterize distal autonomic dysfunction, particularly in the context of peripheral neuropathies. Methods Neurophysiological tests exploring autonomic vasomotor and sudomotor function have been reviewed. The accuracy of each technique for the diagnosis of small-fiber autonomic neuropathy has been assessed. Results Sudomotor innervation can be investigated by many tests including sympathetic skin reflex recording (SSR), quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing (QSART), electrochemical skin conductance measurement (ESC) by Sudoscan®, and the Neuropad® colorimetric test. Both the Neuropad® test and ESC measurement by Sudoscan®, provide early markers of neuropathy in context of familial amyloid polyneuropathy as well as in diabetic polyneuropathy. The Neuropad® test could be used as a screening tool, requiring confirmation by ESC measurement by Sudoscan®, which is more convenient for follow-up assessment. Unlike the SSR, QSART is also a sensitive test for detecting sudomotor dysfunction. However, its test-retest reliability is really moderate. For vasomotor aspects, investigation includes the stimulated skin wrinkling (SSW) test, laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) and laser Doppler imaging (LDI-flare). The SSW test appears valuable when applied to the fingers, but not to the toes. The LDF and LDI-flare tests were found to be sensitive in various clinical contexts (e.g., Parkinson's disease, diabetes, and HIV infection), but they lack standardization and have poor test-retest reliability, especially LDF. Conclusion Sudomotor tests and notably ESC measurement by Sudoscan® appear to be relevant to assess distal autonomic dysfunction in the context of peripheral neuropathy, while the reliability of vasomotor tests should still be improved. Finally, various autonomic tests that are not performed at limb extremities can also be very informative and sensitive in this clinical context, such as heart rate variability measurement at deep breathing.