Abstract
This essay focuses on the recent evolution of national security assessments (NSAs) and national security strategies (NSSs) and evaluates how best to make use of them. While accepting that NSAs are a fairly novel development that indicates more joined-up thinking at the government level, they remain limited for two primary reasons. First, they have tended to be laden with cognitive bias, often reflecting near-term security interests and short-term thinking. Second, there is often a range of implementation problems related to moving from the assessment of risk to the realization of effective security policy. As such, truly benefitting from these risk assessments requires that policymakers counter cognitive biases and develop policy processes that are able to move from the identification of threats to a policy response.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.