Abstract

AbstractIf one has Humean inclinations, what account should one provide for idealization laws? I introduce the currently most popular Humean approach to laws of nature, the best systems account, along with some basic requirements for how to be Humean. I then show why idealization laws are unlikely to be accommodated within this account of laws. Finally, I offer an alternative approach that takes idealization laws to be meta-laws, placing requirements on the theorems of the best system.

Highlights

  • Introduction and planIf one has Humean inclinations, what account should one provide for idealisation laws? In §2 I introduce the most currently popular Humean approach to laws of nature: the Best Systemss Account, along with some basic requirements for how to be Humean

  • Difficulties may arise when we look at particular kinds of law

  • If we are to fit the idealisation law corresponding to the idealising equation Eq.1 into the form of Sch.1 one option is to ‘go broad’ and consider the relevant system type to be being a real fluid (RF), providing the following generalisation

Read more

Summary

Introduction and plan

If one has Humean inclinations, what account should one provide for idealisation laws?

Grounding laws in the mosaic’s regularities
Best Systems Account
Satisfying the Humean requirements
The problem: idealisation laws
Going broad
Going narrow
A contrast in problems
The solution: ‘going meta’
Idealisation laws as meta-laws about super laws
Why going meta is better
Satisfying Humean considerations (again)
Conclusion
Findings
Introduction
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call