Abstract
This paper presents initial signs of a new sensibility in the Brazilian Constitutional Court in reassessing the deferential approach when it comes to judicial review over public choices held by the administrative state. Precedents can be presented before the pandemics, and event after, in provisional injunctions held by the Court, considering a normative framework edited to address the health crisis that expanded the deliberative powers of federative entities and administrative agencies. Even though the limited number of rulings prevent classifying those events as a new trend in the Brazilian Constitutional Court, peremptory refusal on the deferential approach is certainly overcome.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.