Abstract

Archibald, S. et al. 2001, Utilization behavior: Clinical manifestations and neurological mechanisms, Neuropsychology Review, 11, 117– 130. Baertschi, B. 2008, The burden of self-consciousness, Am J Bioethics, 8(9), 33-34. Blair, R.J.R. et al. 2001, A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies, J. Abnorm. Child Psychol, 29, 491–498. Blair, R.J.R. 2007, The amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in morality and psychopathy,Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol.11 No.9, 386-392. Blair, R.J.R. 2010, Neuroimaging of Psychopathy and Antisocial Behavior, Psychiatry Rep, 12, 76–82. Brown, T. & E.Murphy. 2010, Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendantʼs Past Mental States, Stanford Law Review, Vol.62 Iss.4, 1119-1208. Cantagallo, A. et al. 2010, Verbal commands help the execution of endogenous movements in anarchic hand, Neuropsychol Rehabil; 20(3), 406-422. Cardellicchio, P., C. Sinigaglia, M. Costantini (in press), The space of affordances: a TMS study, Neuropsychologia. Clarke, A. & D.Chalmers. 1998, The extended mind, Analysis, 58, 10-23. Clark, A. 2008, Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Coccaro, E.F., et al. 2011, Amygdala and orbitofrontal reactivity to social threat in individuals with impulsive aggression. Biol Psychiatry, 62, 168–178. Costantini, M., et al. 2010, Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space, Exp Brain Res, 207, pp. 95-103. Costantini, M., et al. 2011, Ready Both to Your and to My Hands: Mapping the Action Space of Others, PLoS ONE, Vol.6 Iss.4, 1-6. Dolan, M. & R. Fullam 2006, Face affect recognition deficits in personality-disordered offenders: association with psychopathy. Psychol. Med. 36, 1563–1569. Eslinger, P.J. 2002, The anatomic basis of utilisation behaviour, Cortex, 38 (3), 273-6. Frick, M.P.J., et al. 2003, Callous-unemotional traits and conduct problems in the prediction of conduct problem severity, aggression, and self-report delinquency, J. Abnorm. Child Psychol, 31, 457–47. Gallagher, S. 2003. Self-narrative in schizophrenia, in ed. David, A.S. & T. Kircher, The Self and Schizophrenia: A Neuropsychological Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 336-357. Gallagher, S. 2007, The natural philosophy of agency, Philosophy Compass, 2 (2), pp 347-357. Gallagher, S. 2010, Multiple aspects in the sense of agency, New Ideas in Psychology. Gallese, V., C. Sinigaglia. 2010, The bodily self as power for action, Neuropsychologia, N.48, 746-755. Glannon, W. 2009, Our brain are not us, Bioethics, 23, 321-329. Glannon, W. 2011, Diminishing and Enhancing Free Will, AJOB Neuroscience, Vol.3, 15-26. Kendler, K.S., et al. in press, A multivariate twin study of the DSM-IV criteria for ASPD, Biol Psychiatry. Lee, M.T.M., et al. 2008, Strong limbic and weak frontal activation to aggressive stimuli in spouse abusers, Mol Psychiatry, 13, 655–656. Lee, M.T.M., et al. 2009, Hyperresponsivity to threat stimuli in domestic violence offenders: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study, J Clin Psychiatry, 70, 36–45 Mobbs, D. et al., 2007, Law, Responsibility and the Brain, PLoS Biology, Vol.5 Iss.4, 693-700. Pacherie, E. 2006, The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework, Cognition, 107, 179-217. Pacherie, E. 2007, The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency, Psyche, Vol.13, No.1, 1-30. Pacherie, E. 2010, Self-Agency, in S. Gallagher (ed), The Oxford Handbook of the Self, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Pacherie, E. 2011, The phenomenology of joint action: self-agency vs. joint-agency; Seeman, A. (ed.), Joint attention: new developments, Cambridge MA, MIT Press. Pietrini, P. & V. Bambini, 2009, Homo ferox: the contribution of functional brain studies to understanding the neural bases of aggressive and criminal behavior, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, Vol.32, 259-265. Sundram, F., et al. in press, White matter microstructural abnormalities in the frontal lobe of adults with antisocial personality disorder, Cortex CONCLUSIVE CONSIDERATIONS: Recent works focus on the probative value of neuroscientific techniques (MRI, fMRI, PET, etc.) in courts. We argue that there is another more basic perspective to approach the relationship between neuroscience and law, that is to focus on its conditions of possibility and shifting its core to the psychiatric forensic evaluation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.