Abstract
BackgroundGenetic studies have implicated rare and common variations in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of the discovered risk variants, those rare in the population invariably have large impact on liability, while common variants have small effects. Yet, collectively, common risk variants account for the majority of population-level variability. How these rare and common risk variants jointly affect liability for individuals requires further study.MethodsTo explore how common and rare variants jointly affect liability, we assessed two cohorts of ASD families characterized for rare and common genetic variations (Simons Simplex Collection and Population-Based Autism Genetics and Environment Study). We analyzed data from 3011 affected subjects, as well as two cohorts of unaffected individuals characterized for common genetic variation: 3011 subjects matched for ancestry to ASD subjects and 11,950 subjects for estimating allele frequencies. We used genetic scores, which assessed the relative burden of common genetic variation affecting risk of ASD (henceforth “burden”), and determined how this burden was distributed among three subpopulations: ASD subjects who carry a potentially damaging variant implicated in risk of ASD (“PDV carriers”); ASD subjects who do not (“non-carriers”); and unaffected subjects who are assumed to be non-carriers.ResultsBurden harbored by ASD subjects is stochastically greater than that harbored by control subjects. For PDV carriers, their average burden is intermediate between non-carrier ASD and control subjects. Both carrier and non-carrier ASD subjects have greater burden, on average, than control subjects. The effects of common and rare variants likely combine additively to determine individual-level liability.LimitationsOnly 305 ASD subjects were known PDV carriers. This relatively small subpopulation limits this study to characterizing general patterns of burden, as opposed to effects of specific PDVs or genes. Also, a small fraction of subjects that are categorized as non-carriers could be PDV carriers.ConclusionsLiability arising from common and rare risk variations likely combines additively to determine risk of any individual diagnosed with ASD. On average, ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they also carry a rare PDV affecting risk.
Highlights
Genetic studies have implicated rare and common variations in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they carry a rare PDV affecting risk
Regarding (3), it appears that ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they carry a rare PDV affecting risk
Summary
Genetic studies have implicated rare and common variations in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Common risk variants account for the majority of population-level variability How these rare and common risk variants jointly affect liability for individuals requires further study. Klei et al Molecular Autism (2021) 12:66 of a large set of genes are sufficient to cause the disorder Another emphasizes the major role played by common variation—shared by all of us to a greater or lesser extent (infinitesimal model)—in the documented high heritability of ASD [2,3,4,5,6]. Our current understanding of the genetic architecture of ASD is unsatisfactory, especially regarding how common and rare variations jointly confer risk. Establishing the exact nature of the interplay between common and rare risk variations will be challenging, because of the multiplicity of plausible models that could fit the current data
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.