Piecing together a different picture: A host of new studies on autism have begun decoding the longstanding puzzle of its causes.
“A developmental disability that hinders the normal functioning of the brain, affecting, in varying degrees, communication skills and social interaction. Repetitive behaviours, and different ways of learning, paying attention, or reacting to things are often distinctive signs”. This standard definition of autism fails to describe the complexity of a condition that ranges in its manifestations from severe intellectual impairment to superior cognitive skills, like in the Asperger syndrome. To comprise such diversity, autism disorders are now covered under the umbrella term “autism spectrum disorder” (ASD). In most cases, ASD manifests during the first 5 years of life, with boys significantly more likely to be diagnosed than girls. ASD usually goes together with several other problems that frequently include anxiety, sleep disorders, or epilepsy. No cure exists; treatment, such as speech therapy, just attempts to alleviate specific deficits of autistic patients. > Nothing is simple in autism. Even the real number of people affected is uncertain. Nothing is simple in autism. Even the real number of people affected is uncertain. The US CDC estimates that about 1 in 68 (or 1.5%) of children in the USA are living with ASD (http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html). The WHO has a more conservative estimate, last revised in January this year, of 1 in 160 children, based on a larger set of epidemiological surveys (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/autism-spectrum-disorders/en/). Needless to say, most studies were conducted in developed countries, and the prevalence of ASD in many low‐ and middle‐income countries remains largely unknown. > Along the years, many potential causes have been indicated, including genetic and environmental factors, exposure to toxins during pregnancy, wide gaps between parent ages, and so on Although the general consensus is that prevalence rates are increasing globally, this point is debated too. Some analyses indicate that a large percentage of the increase in ASD owes to improved awareness and …
- Research Article
452
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.04.015
- May 16, 2013
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
Sequence Kernel Association Tests for the Combined Effect of Rare and Common Variants
- Discussion
6
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.09.022
- Oct 27, 2009
- Biological Psychiatry
Autism: The Ups and Downs of Neuroligin
- Research Article
20
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009309
- Feb 4, 2021
- PLOS Genetics
Recent advances in consortium-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have highlighted the involvement of common genetic variants in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but our understanding of their etiologic roles, especially the interplay with rare variants, is incomplete. In this work, we introduce an analytical framework to quantify the transmission disequilibrium of genetically regulated gene expression from parents to offspring. We applied this framework to conduct a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) on 7,805 ASD proband-parent trios, and replicated our findings using 35,740 independent samples. We identified 31 associations at the transcriptome-wide significance level. In particular, we identified POU3F2 (p = 2.1E-7), a transcription factor mainly expressed in developmental brain. Gene targets regulated by POU3F2 showed a 2.7-fold enrichment for known ASD genes (p = 2.0E-5) and a 2.7-fold enrichment for loss-of-function de novo mutations in ASD probands (p = 7.1E-5). These results provide a novel connection between rare and common variants, whereby ASD genes affected by very rare mutations are regulated by an unlinked transcription factor affected by common genetic variations.
- Discussion
10
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.02.031
- Feb 27, 2015
- Biological Psychiatry
DSM-5 and Psychiatric Genetics — Round Hole, Meet Square Peg
- Research Article
42
- 10.1038/ejhg.2015.37
- Mar 18, 2015
- European Journal of Human Genetics
Recent findings revealed rare copy number variants and missense changes in the X-linked gene PTCHD1 in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID). Here, we aim to explore the contribution of common PTCHD1 variants in ASD and gain additional evidence for the role of rare variants of this gene in ASD and ID. A two-stage case-control association study investigated 28 tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 994 ASD cases and 1035 controls from four European populations. Mutation screening was performed in 673 individuals who included 240 ASD cases, 183 ID patients and 250 controls. The case-control association study showed a significant association with rs7052177 (P=6.13E-4) in the ASD discovery sample that was replicated in an independent sample (P=0.03). A Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis for rs7052177T considering the four European populations showed an odds ratio of 0.58 (P=7E-05). This SNP is predicted to be located in a transcription factor binding site. No rare missense PTCHD1 variants were found in our ASD cohort and only one was identified in the ID sample. A duplication (27 bp) in the promoter region, absent from 590 controls, was found in three ASD patients (Fisher exact test, P=0.024). A gene reporter assay showed a significant decrease in the transcriptional activity (26%) driven by this variant. Moreover, we found that the longest allele of a trinucleotide repeat located upstream from PTCHD1 was associated with ASD (P=0.003, permP=0.0186). Our results further support the involvement of PTCHD1 in ASD, suggesting that both common and rare variants contribute to the disorder.
- Research Article
127
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.10.012
- Nov 1, 2010
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
Extending Rare-Variant Testing Strategies: Analysis of Noncoding Sequence and Imputed Genotypes
- Research Article
56
- 10.1186/s13229-021-00466-2
- Oct 6, 2021
- Molecular Autism
BackgroundGenetic studies have implicated rare and common variations in liability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Of the discovered risk variants, those rare in the population invariably have large impact on liability, while common variants have small effects. Yet, collectively, common risk variants account for the majority of population-level variability. How these rare and common risk variants jointly affect liability for individuals requires further study.MethodsTo explore how common and rare variants jointly affect liability, we assessed two cohorts of ASD families characterized for rare and common genetic variations (Simons Simplex Collection and Population-Based Autism Genetics and Environment Study). We analyzed data from 3011 affected subjects, as well as two cohorts of unaffected individuals characterized for common genetic variation: 3011 subjects matched for ancestry to ASD subjects and 11,950 subjects for estimating allele frequencies. We used genetic scores, which assessed the relative burden of common genetic variation affecting risk of ASD (henceforth “burden”), and determined how this burden was distributed among three subpopulations: ASD subjects who carry a potentially damaging variant implicated in risk of ASD (“PDV carriers”); ASD subjects who do not (“non-carriers”); and unaffected subjects who are assumed to be non-carriers.ResultsBurden harbored by ASD subjects is stochastically greater than that harbored by control subjects. For PDV carriers, their average burden is intermediate between non-carrier ASD and control subjects. Both carrier and non-carrier ASD subjects have greater burden, on average, than control subjects. The effects of common and rare variants likely combine additively to determine individual-level liability.LimitationsOnly 305 ASD subjects were known PDV carriers. This relatively small subpopulation limits this study to characterizing general patterns of burden, as opposed to effects of specific PDVs or genes. Also, a small fraction of subjects that are categorized as non-carriers could be PDV carriers.ConclusionsLiability arising from common and rare risk variations likely combines additively to determine risk of any individual diagnosed with ASD. On average, ASD subjects carry a substantial burden of common risk variation, even if they also carry a rare PDV affecting risk.
- Research Article
21
- 10.3390/jcm9061851
- Jun 13, 2020
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
The 14-3-3 protein family are molecular chaperones involved in several biological functions and neurological diseases. We previously pinpointed YWHAZ (encoding 14-3-3ζ) as a candidate gene for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) through a whole-exome sequencing study, which identified a frameshift variant within the gene (c.659-660insT, p.L220Ffs*18). Here, we explored the contribution of the seven human 14-3-3 family members in ASD and other psychiatric disorders by investigating the: (i) functional impact of the 14-3-3ζ mutation p.L220Ffs*18 by assessing solubility, target binding and dimerization; (ii) contribution of common risk variants in 14-3-3 genes to ASD and additional psychiatric disorders; (iii) burden of rare variants in ASD and schizophrenia; and iv) 14-3-3 gene expression using ASD and schizophrenia transcriptomic data. We found that the mutant 14-3-3ζ protein had decreased solubility and lost its ability to form heterodimers and bind to its target tyrosine hydroxylase. Gene-based analyses using publicly available datasets revealed that common variants in YWHAE contribute to schizophrenia (p = 6.6 × 10−7), whereas ultra-rare variants were found enriched in ASD across the 14-3-3 genes (p = 0.017) and in schizophrenia for YWHAZ (meta-p = 0.017). Furthermore, expression of 14-3-3 genes was altered in post-mortem brains of ASD and schizophrenia patients. Our study supports a role for the 14-3-3 family in ASD and schizophrenia.
- Research Article
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6581159/v1
- May 15, 2025
- Research Square
The genetic heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) presents significant challenges in understanding its pathogenic mechanisms, as the genetic risk involves numerous common variants and rare de novo or inherited variants. Prior research has mainly focused on identifying rare variants and their impact on neurodevelopment and neuronal functions in cortical brain regions. By contrast, common variants, which contribute substantially to ASD heritability, remain understudied, suggesting a need to consider both variant types to understand ASD’s genetic mechanisms. Previous studies have also implicated subcortical brain regions and peripheral digestive and immune systems, but tissue-specific mechanisms remain unclear. We address these knowledge gaps by identifying gene networks, pathways, and key regulators informed by ASD common variants in brain and peripheral tissues, further examining whether these networks also capture genes informed by rare variants. Our approach integrates genome wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, tissue-level genetics of gene expression, and gene coexpression and transcriptional regulatory networks across ~50 tissues. Our multitissue, multiomics analysis reveals that key brain regions and networks crucial for synaptic signaling and neurodevelopment are enriched for both rare and common variants, whereas peripheral tissues, such as the digestive and immune systems, are primarily informed by common variants. This partitioning of key tissues and biological pathways into core (targeted by both variant types) and modifying components provide insight into ASD heterogeneity. We also identified central gene network regulators, such as SYT1 and ADD2, which may orchestrate the effects of both common and rare ASD genetic risk factors on ASD pathogenesis.
- Research Article
- 10.1038/s41398-026-03824-x
- Feb 6, 2026
- Translational psychiatry
The genetic heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) presents significant challenges in understanding its pathogenic mechanisms, as the genetic risk involves numerous common variants and rare de novo or inherited variants. Prior research has mainly focused on identifying rare variants and their impact on neurodevelopment and neuronal functions in cortical brain regions. By contrast, common variants, which contribute substantially to ASD heritability, remain understudied, suggesting a need to consider both variant types to understand ASD's genetic mechanisms. Previous studies have also implicated subcortical brain regions and peripheral digestive and immune systems, but tissue-specific mechanisms remain unclear. We address these knowledge gaps by identifying gene networks, pathways, and key regulators informed by ASD common variants in brain and peripheral tissues, further examining whether these networks also capture genes informed by rare variants. Our approach integrates genome wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, tissue-level genetics of gene expression, and gene coexpression and transcriptional regulatory networks across ~50 tissues. Our multitissue, multiomics analysis reveals that key brain regions and networks crucial for synaptic signaling and neurodevelopment are enriched for both rare and common variants, whereas peripheral tissues, such as the digestive and immune systems, are primarily informed by common variants. This partitioning of key tissues and biological pathways into core (targeted by both variant types) and modifying components provide insight into ASD heterogeneity. We also identified central gene network regulators, such as SYT1 and ADD2, which may orchestrate the effects of both common and rare ASD genetic risk factors on ASD pathogenesis.
- Research Article
6
- 10.1007/s11427-012-4336-5
- Sep 2, 2015
- Science China. Life sciences
Currently, there is great interest in identifying genetic variants that contribute to the risk of developing autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), due in part to recent increases in the frequency of diagnosis of these disorders worldwide. While there is nearly universal agreement that ASDs are complex diseases, with multiple genetic and environmental contributing factors, there is less agreement concerning the relative importance of common vs rare genetic variants in ASD liability. Recent observations that rare mutations and copy number variants (CNVs) are frequently associated with ASDs, combined with reduced fecundity of individuals with these disorders, has led to the hypothesis that ASDs are caused primarily by de novo or rare genetic mutations. Based on this model, large-scale whole-genome DNA sequencing has been proposed as the most appropriate method for discovering ASD liability genes. While this approach will undoubtedly identify many novel candidate genes and produce important new insights concerning the genetic causes of these disorders, a full accounting of the genetics of ASDs will be incomplete absent an understanding of the contributions of common regulatory variants, which are likely to influence ASD liability by modifying the effects of rare variants or, by assuming unfavorable combinations, directly produce these disorders. Because it is not yet possible to identify regulatory genetic variants by examination of DNA sequences alone, their identification will require experimentation. In this essay, I discuss these issues and describe the advantages of measurements of allelic expression imbalance (AEI) of mRNA expression for identifying cis-acting regulatory variants that contribute to ASDs.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1007/s10048-017-0529-1
- Nov 18, 2017
- neurogenetics
Alterations of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) signaling system has been strongly linked to the pathophysiology of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Genetic associations of common variants in GABA receptor subunits, in particular GABRA4 on chromosome 4p12, with ASD have been replicated by several studies. Moreover, molecular investigations have identified altered transcriptional and translational levels of this gene and protein in brains of ASD individuals. Since the genotyped common variants are likely not the functional variants contributing to the molecular consequences or underlying ASD phenotype, this study aims to examine rare sequence variants in GABRA4, including those outside the protein coding regions of the gene. We comprehensively re-sequenced the entire protein coding and noncoding portions of the gene and putative regulatory sequences in 82 ASD individuals and 55 developmentally typical pediatric controls, all homozygous for the most significant previously associated ASD risk allele (G/G at rs1912960). We identified only a single common, coding variant, and no association of any single marker or set of variants with ASD. Functional annotation of noncoding variants identified several rare variants in putative regulatory sites. Finally, a rare variant unique to ASD cases, in an evolutionary conserved site of the 3'UTR, shows a trend toward decreasing gene expression. Hence, GABRA4 rare variants in noncoding DNA may be variants of modest physiological effects in ASD etiology.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1111/jcmm.16161
- Jan 21, 2021
- Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by a complex polygenic background, but with the unique feature of a subset of cases (~15%‐30%) presenting a rare large‐effect variant. However, clinical interpretation in these cases is often complicated by incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity and different neurodevelopmental trajectories. NRXN1 intragenic deletions represent the prototype of such ASD‐associated susceptibility variants. From chromosomal microarrays analysis of 104 ASD individuals, we identified an inherited NRXN1 deletion in a trio family. We carried out whole‐exome sequencing and deep sequencing of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in this family, to evaluate the burden of rare variants which may contribute to the phenotypic outcome in NRXN1 deletion carriers. We identified an increased burden of exonic rare variants in the ASD child compared to the unaffected NRXN1 deletion‐transmitting mother, which remains significant if we restrict the analysis to potentially deleterious rare variants only (P = 6.07 × 10−5). We also detected significant interaction enrichment among genes with damaging variants in the proband, suggesting that additional rare variants in interacting genes collectively contribute to cross the liability threshold for ASD. Finally, the proband's mtDNA presented five low‐level heteroplasmic mtDNA variants that were absent in the mother, and two maternally inherited variants with increased heteroplasmic load. This study underlines the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the genomic background in carriers of large‐effect variants, as penetrance modulation by additional interacting rare variants to might represent a widespread mechanism in neurodevelopmental disorders.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1080/09540261.2022.2072193
- Feb 17, 2022
- International Review of Psychiatry
Chromatin remodelling is an important process in neural development and is related to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) aetiology. To further elucidate the involvement of chromatin remodelling genes in the genetic aetiology of ASD and SCZ in the Japanese population, we performed a case–control study. Targeted sequencing was conducted on coding regions of four BAF chromatin remodelling complex genes: SMARCA2, SMARCA4, SMARCC2, and ARID1B in 185 ASD, 432 SCZ patients, and 517 controls. 27 rare non-synonymous variants were identified in ASD and SCZ patients, including 25 missense, one in-frame deletion in SMRACA4, and one frame-shift variant in SMARCC2. Association analysis was conducted to investigate the burden of rare variants in BAF genes in ASD and SCZ patients. Significant enrichment of rare missense variants in BAF genes, but not synonymous variants, was found in ASD compared to controls. Rare pathogenic variants indicated by in silico tools were significantly enriched in ASD, but not statistically significant in SCZ. Pathogenic-predicted variants were located in disordered binding regions and may confer risk for ASD and SCZ by disrupting protein–protein interactions. Our study supports the involvement of rare missense variants of BAF genes in ASD and SCZ susceptibility.
- Research Article
9
- 10.3389/fphar.2020.00585
- May 14, 2020
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by impairments in social communication and restricted and repetitive behaviors and interests. Identifying the genetic background may be one of the key features for the future diagnosis and treatment of ASD. With the tremendous development in genetic diagnosis techniques, next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to analyze multiple genes simultaneously with a single test in laboratory and clinical settings and is well suited for investigating autism genetics. According to previous studies, there are two types of genetic variants in ASD, rare variants and common variants, and both are important in explaining pathogenesis. In this study, NGS data from 137 participants with ASD were reviewed retrospectively with consideration for comorbid epilepsy. Diagnostic yield was 17.51% (24/137), and pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were seen more frequently in female participants. Fourteen participants were diagnosed with comorbid epilepsy, six of them had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (43%). Genes with variants of unknown significance (VOUS) which have one or more evidence of pathogenicity following the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria were also reviewed in both ASD and ASD with comorbid epilepsy groups. We found that most frequently found VOUS genes have previously been reported as genes related to ASD or other developmental disorders. These results suggest that when interpreting the NGS results in the clinical setting, careful observation of VOUS with some pathological evidence might contribute to the discovery of genetic pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders such as ASD and epilepsy.