Abstract

BackgroundLow participation in health promotion programs (HPPs) might hamper their effectiveness. A potential reason for low participation is disagreement between needs and preferences of potential participants and the actual HPPs offered. This study aimed to investigate employees’ need and preferences for HPPs, whether these are matched by what their employers provide, and whether a higher agreement enhanced participation.MethodsEmployees of two organizations participated in a six-month follow-up study (n = 738). At baseline, information was collected on employees’ needs and preferences for the topic of the HPP (i.e. physical activity, healthy nutrition, smoking cessation, stress management, general health), whether they favored a HPP via their employer or at their own discretion, and their preferred HPP regarding three components with each two alternatives: mode of delivery (individual vs. group), intensity (single vs. multiple meetings), and content (assignments vs. information). Participation in HPPs was assessed at six-month follow-up. In consultation with occupational health managers (n = 2), information was gathered on the HPPs the employers provided. The level of agreement between preferred and provided HPPs was calculated (range: 0–1) and its influence on participation was studied using logistic regression analyses.ResultsMost employees reported needing a HPP addressing physical activity (55%) and most employees preferred HPPs organized via their employer. The mean level of agreement between the preferred and offered HPPs ranged from 0.71 for mode of delivery to 0.84 for intensity, and was 0.47 for all three HPP components within a topic combined. Employees with a higher agreement on mode of delivery (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.87-3.39) and all HPP components combined (OR: 2.36, 95% CI: 0.68-8.17) seemed to be more likely to participate in HPPs, but due to low participation these associations were not statistically significant.ConclusionHPPs aimed at physical activity were most needed by employees. The majority of employees favor HPPs organized via the employer above those at their own discretion, supporting the provision of HPPs at the workplace. This study provides some indications that a higher agreement between employees’ needs and preferences and HPPs made available by their employers will enhance participation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1277) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Low participation in health promotion programs (HPPs) might hamper their effectiveness

  • Higher participation is reached with Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) focusing on multiple behaviors and consisting of various components [11] and effectiveness of WHPPs is greater when it consists of multiple meetings [9]

  • Health promotion program preferences More than half of the employees (55%) reported to need a HPP that addresses physical activity, followed by general health (45%), stress management (39%), healthy nutrition (33%), and smoking cessation (7%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Low participation in health promotion programs (HPPs) might hamper their effectiveness. Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) are increasingly being provided to employees, especially in larger organizations [1]. Barriers related to the individual (e.g. no time, no motivation) as well as logistic reasons (e.g. location and time of the program) during implementation are often said to impede participation [13,14,15,16,17]. These barriers lower the likelihood of employees having a positive intention towards participation, they hardly influence their decision to participate [18]. More insight is needed into other factors that might explain participation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.