Abstract

There is a growing body of clinical evidence that indicates that patients can maintain relatively normal shoulder function despite a tear in the rotator cuff. This has been proven with magnetic resonance imaging studies of asymptomatic patients1 as well as clinical studies revealing unsuspected disruptions following rotator cuff repair2. Indeed, clinical series in which only partial rotator cuff repairs were performed have yielded good results despite the fact that there was a known deficiency in the rotator cuff following surgery3,4. In all of these scenarios, patients are often minimally symptomatic and maintain good shoulder function with minimal pain. There is poor correlation between cuff tear size and the degree of either pain or functional restrictions noted by the patient. This would tend to indicate that there are factors intrinsic to different types of cuff tears that lead to varying degrees of symptoms. Burkhart et al. were the first to propose a theoretical basis for this phenomenon with the “suspension bridge” model5. They postulated that, if intact portions of the cuff anteriorly and …

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.