Abstract

Authoritarian regimes are frequent targets of international pressure in the form of economic sanctions or threats thereof. Existing research shows that foreign interventions can carry several unintended consequences for politics and the economy in the targeted countries. One of the side effects of such interventions is boosting support for incumbent autocrats. Public demonstrations in support of embattled leaders are one aspect of this dynamic. This article investigates the link between foreign pressure and domestic mobilization in favor of ruling autocrats. It is argued that pressure simultaneously increases regime supporters’ willingness to participate in rallies and the regime’s demand to display and even overstate regime support. Foreign pressure facilitates mobilization as autocrats can fuel nationalist sentiments and frame foreign interventions as an attack on the nation as a whole. At the same time, rallies are a strategic tool to reduce political opportunities for the opposition and to signal resolve to the international community. Empirically, I conduct the first quantitative analysis that evidences the existence of a relationship between international pressure and mobilization in support of incumbent autocrats. Using monthly data on rally events in all authoritarian regimes between 2003 and 2015, I find that sanctions but also threats significantly increase pro-government mobilization. In addition, I show evidence for a moderating role of media freedom in the targeted state, highlighting the importance of how international events are portrayed in national news.

Highlights

  • Authoritarian leaders do everything they can in order to stay in power

  • When we look at the temporal relationship between sanction events and pro-government rallies, a similar trend emerges

  • The results show a positive relationship between the different measurements of international pressure and pro-government rallies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Authoritarian leaders do everything they can in order to stay in power. For this purpose, they rig elections, crack down on dissidents, restrict civil liberties, or violate human rights. More press freedom results in higher exposure to alternative perspectives on the causes and consequences of international conflict and should lead to smaller rally effects While such nationalist framings are appealing to some citizens, it is important to emphasize that not all participants at pro-government rallies genuinely support the regime. To conduct a systematic study on the relationship between international pressure and domestic mobilization, this study combines event data on pro-government rallies, foreign threats, and sanction data. Large-scale protest against the government and repressive state responses could coincide with mobilization in favor of the government and interventions by foreign powers Ignoring these polarization dynamics would lead us to overestimate the effect of international pressure.

Methods and results
Conclusion
Findings
See the article “Venezuela
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call