Abstract

Considered in its articulation with an idea of “slow” cinema, the label “fast cinema” suggests three characteristics: fast-paced action, hyperkinetic cinematic style, and irreflexive consumption. Not only does fast cinema suggest these three characteristics, however, it also suggests that they directly correspond to each other so that, in a “fast” film, fast-paced action would be seamlessly rendered through “fast” cinematic enunciation and this rendering would necessarily result in an escapist, ready-to-consume film product. It is more by this correspondence, I think, than by any of these elements on its own that a certain understanding of “fast” cinema is established.
 Against this understanding, through a variety of contrasting examples, the article argues that the impression of fastness and that of slowness are both the matter of a tension between different temporalities and a complex combination of heterogeneous film elements, and that the articulation of “fast” and “slow” cinema itself depends less on the formal characteristics of different kinds of film than on a disciplinary understanding of spectatorship, which pretends to derive from these formal characteristics different and unequal forms of film experience.

Highlights

  • Does fast cinema suggest these three characteristics, it suggests that they directly correspond to each other so that, in a ‘fast’ film, fast-paced action would be seamlessly rendered through ‘fast’ cinematic enunciation and this rendering would necessarily result in an escapist, ready-to-consume film product

  • I want to argue that the impression of fastness and that of slowness are both the matter of a tension between different temporalities and a complex combination of heterogeneous film elements, and that the articulation of ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ cinema itself depends less on the formal characteristics of different kinds of film than on a disciplinary understanding of spectatorship, which pretends to derive from these formal characteristics different and unequal forms of film experience

  • The quickness with which we recognise ‘fast cinema’ and the looseness of its definition suggest that the concept is being used not merely as a label and as a consensual category

Read more

Summary

Vistula University

How Fast is Furious The Discourse of Fast Cinema in Question ‘who dreamt and made incarnate gaps in Time & Space through images juxtaposed’. I think, than by any of these elements on its own that a certain understanding of fast cinema is established. Against this understanding, I want to argue that the impression of fastness and that of slowness are both the matter of a tension between different temporalities and a complex combination of heterogeneous film elements, and that the articulation of ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ cinema itself depends less on the formal characteristics of different kinds of film than on a disciplinary understanding of spectatorship, which pretends to derive from these formal characteristics different and unequal forms of film experience

Fast and loose
Dynamic duration
Arrested action
Irreflexive consumption and aesthetic temporality
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call