Abstract

Among the Asabano of Papua New Guinea, dreams deemed true have motivated hunting expeditions, medical treatments, and religious conversion. In contrast, dreams deemed false have negligibly affected behaviour. The Asabano draw on multiple and changing opinions and theories of dreams and dreaming when assessing whether or not particular dreams accurately represented reality. Dreams conforming to several dream scenario genres routinely receive attention as potential “true” dreams. These scenarios concern hunting, illness, death, and since contact, Christianity. Analysis of subsequent waking events resolves ambiguous cases. Asabano dream theories have changed in response to enculturation, diffusion, and personal experiences. Theories and methods of evaluating remembered dreams influence agency and events. I argue that classifying particular dreams as true or false is an historical process because once a remembered dream is labelled “true” or “false” it motivates appropriately responsive action or inaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.