How Does Nodular Chromite Nucleate and Grow? An Integrated Microstructural and Petrological Approach

Abstract

Abstract Nodular chromite ore deposits are found in ophiolites and crop out in structures interpreted as former dykes. Most of them are transposed parallel to the plastic foliation of the host peridotite. Many studies have been conducted in order to decipher the origin and evolution of nodular chromite but the outstanding lack of consensus paves the way for an integrated field, geochemical and microstructural approach to be carried out. We sampled the well-characterized Maqsad chromitite dyke that crops out at the top of the mantle–crust dunitic transition zone in the Oman ophiolite and that was not affected by transposition. The spectacular variations in nodule size and texture and their distribution within the dyke have been perfectly preserved which is a rather unique situation. We selected about 40 nodules representative of the shapes and size variability of this ore deposit. Nodules have been classified in three categories: Type-1 nodules are large skeletal chromite grains associated with amphibole and olivine filling their former porosity; Type-3 nodules have a central nucleus of chromite/silicate surrounded by a mantle of close-packed chromite grains. Their shape is best described as almond-like, and they may reach 3 cm in length; Type-2 includes all of the intermediate nodules shapes and sizes between type-1 and type-3 varieties. Electron Probe MicroAnalyser (EPMA) transects and maps show that mineral chemical variations in type-1 nodules and in the nuclei of type-2 and type-3 nodules record out of equilibrium crystal growth. They exhibit high XCr and relatively low-TiO2 and likely resulted from transient interactions between hydrothermal fluids and basaltic melts. Contrary to type-1 and nuclei, the mantles of type-2 and -3 nodules have lower Cr2O3 contents, decreasing toward the nodule edges. They are richer in TiO2 than type-1 nodules but concentration patterns of this element along edge to edge transects are quite variable. The chromite mantles of type-2 and -3 are best understood as the fractional crystallization products of a parent melt of type-1 nodules in different pFluids and/or redox conditions. The analysis of the distribution of the misorientation axis between the skeletal grains and the adjacent chromite grains in the mantle (N = 222 in 28 nodules) revealed a clustering around a [111] axis across the whole range of misorientation angles. Accordingly, we suggest that the growth of the Maqsad nodules is achieved by accretion of finer euhedral chromite grains onto a skeletal chromite grain by juxtaposition of their flat crystal facets. Combined EDS-EBSD mapping together with EPMA transects revealed that a ~1-mm-thick rim of high XCr, displaying a homothetic shape to its corresponding nuclei, is a common feature in the mantle when the nodule sizes exceed about 1 cm. We interpret this observation as the result of the accretion of grains with higher XCr compositions during the nodule construction. Overall, our new study of the Maqsad nodular chromitite highlights the peculiar and transient conditions needed to give rise to the textural and chemical complexity that is preserved in these enigmatic rocks.