Abstract
BackgroundSocial network processes impact on the genesis and management of mental health problems. There is currently less understanding of the way people negotiate networked relationships in times of crisis compared to how they manage at other times.ObjectiveThis paper explores the patterns and nature of personal network involvement at times of crises and how these may differ from day‐to‐day networks of recovery and maintenance.MethodSemi‐structured interviews with 25 participants with a diagnosis of long‐term mental health (MH) problems drawn from recovery settings in the south of England. Interviews centred on personal network mapping of members and resources providing support. The mapping interviews explored the work of network members and changes in times of crisis. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using a framework analysis.ResultsThree key themes were identified: the fluidity of network relationality between crisis and recovery; isolation as a means of crises management; leaning towards peer support. Personal network input retreated at times of crisis often as result of “ejection” from the network by participants who used self‐isolation as a personal management strategy in an attempt to deal with crises. Peer support is considered useful during a crisis, whilst the role of services was viewed with some ambiguity.ConclusionsSocial networks membership, and type and depth of involvement, is subject to change between times of crisis and everyday support. This has implications for managing mental health in terms of engaging with network support differently in times of crises versus recovery and everyday living.
Highlights
Social interventions for mental health recovery and management have increasingly been viewed as an alternative to more traditional means of management especially in relation to those from underserved communities.[1]
A network perspective offers opportunities to explore the ways in which the quality of social relationships may impact on mental health[5] and to address the latent assets and resources which may be available to people in need of condition management and support which lie outside the formal health-care delivery system.[6]
This study has examined the personal social networks implicated in day-to-day support compared to crisis management of those experiencing a mental health problem
Summary
Social interventions for mental health recovery and management have increasingly been viewed as an alternative to more traditional means of management especially in relation to those from underserved communities.[1]. The mapping interviews explored the work of network members and changes in times of crisis. Results: Three key themes were identified: the fluidity of network relationality between crisis and recovery; isolation as a means of crises management; leaning towards peer support. Personal network input retreated at times of crisis often as result of “ejection” from the network by participants who used self-isolation as a personal management strategy in an attempt to deal with crises. Conclusions: Social networks membership, and type and depth of involvement, is subject to change between times of crisis and everyday support. This has implications for managing mental health in terms of engaging with network support differently in times of crises versus recovery and everyday living
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
