Abstract
ObjectivesPrevious studies demonstrated that discrepancies between subjective and objective health measures are associated with physical and mental health–related outcomes in older adults. We investigate whether such discrepancies are also associated with risk of injurious falls in community-dwelling Swedish older adults. DesignA prospective, observational cohort study. Setting and ParticipantsUsing data from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care in Kungsholmen, we followed 2222 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥60 years at baseline, across a 10-year period of data collection (2001-2011). MethodsA “health asymmetry” metric classified older adults into 4 categories, based on the level of agreement between their subjective and objective health scores (“health pessimist”, “health optimist”, “poor health realist”, and “good health realist”). Time-varying Cox proportional hazard and Laplace regressions were employed to investigate if these categories were associated with the risk of injurious falls. ResultsOver a 10-year follow-up, 23.5% of the sample experienced an injurious fall. Health optimists had the greatest risk of experiencing an injurious fall [hazard ratio (HR) 2.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66, 2.80], compared with good health realists. Poor health realists (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.50, 2.11) and health pessimists (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.21, 2.29) also had an increased risk of experiencing injurious falls, compared with good health realists. Being a health pessimist was only associated with the risk of injurious falls within the younger-old (HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.63, 3.64) and among males (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.14, 3.33). Conclusions and ImplicationsOlder adults with similar objective health levels may differ in terms of their injurious fall risk, depending on their subjective health. Interpreting subjective health alongside objective health is clinically pertinent when assessing injurious fall risk.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
