How do antimicrobial peptides disrupt the lipopolysaccharide membrane leaflet of Gram-negative bacteria?

Abstract

HypothesisIt is widely regarded that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) kill bacteria by physically disrupting microbial membranes and causing cytoplasmic leakage, but it remains unclear how AMPs disrupt the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and then compromise the inner membrane. We hypothesise that different AMPs impose different structural disruptions, with direct implications to their antimicrobial efficacies. ExperimentsThe antimicrobial activities of three typical AMPs, including the designed short AMP, G3, and two natural AMPs, melittin and LL37, against E. coli and their haemolytic activities were studied. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and anionic di-palmitoyl phosphatidyl glycerol (DPPG) monolayer models were constructed to mimic the outer membrane and inner membrane leaflets of Gram-negative bacteria. The binding and penetration of AMPs to the model lipid monolayers were systematically studied by neutron reflection via multiple H/D contrast variations. FindingG3 has relatively high antimicrobial activity, low cytotoxicity, and high proteolytic stability, whilst melittin has significant haemolysis and LL37 has weaker antimicrobial activity. G3 could rapidly lyse LPS and DPPG monolayers within 10–20 min. In contrast, melittin was highly active against the LPS membrane, but the dynamic process lasted up to 80 min, with excessive stacking in the OM. LL37 caused rather weak destruction to LPS and DPPG monolayers, leading to massive adsorption on the membrane surface without penetrating the lipid tail region. These findings demonstrate that the rationally designed AMP G3 was well optimised to impose most effective destruction to bacterial membranes, consistent with its highest bactericidal activity. These different interfacial structural features associated with AMP binding shed light on the future development of active and biocompatible AMPs for infection and wound treatments.