Abstract
Fatigue specimens were manufactured with a number of artificial bond defects. The defects were different configurations of non‐bonded areas within the nominally perfectly‐bonded region. These defects included variants with a reduced degree of bond filling, bonds with a channel without adhesive, zig‐zag‐shaped bond edges, and finally bond areas with smooth corners. Fatigue testing was performed with the bond loaded in the peel mode. The stiffness was measured for the bonds and was found to vary significantly with defect type and size. The fatigue strength was also found to differ substantially for different bond defects. A finite element model combined with fracture mechanics was used to predict the stiffness drop during fatigue testing of the bonded specimens and to predict fatigue life. The effect of defects in the bond on the stiffness and life was predicted in a satisfactory way.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
