Abstract
In recent years, the importance of building evidence in clinical practice that is increasingly acknowledged globally has been recognized in Japan as well, and it is expected that clinical research by community pharmacists will grow. In Japan, however, community pharmacists have few opportunities to learn about research ethics and may lack the training to make ethical decisions. We conducted a questionnaire survey of community pharmacists (n = 200) using a free descriptive format to understand how they perceived research ethics. Our qualitative analysis of 170 respondents revealed various perspectives (<A pharmacist’s grounding>, <How pharmacists perceive research>, and <Ethical issues entailed by research>) of Japanese pharmacists on ethics in the context of clinical research. With respect to how to understand research, the following perspectives were found: “research that prioritizes researchers,” “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients),” and “research that enters into regular work.” The perspectives on “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients)” and “research that enters into regular work” may inadvertently lead to ethically inappropriate research due to mismatch in professional values or poor understanding of research. These findings can contribute to the development of an educational program for community pharmacists on research ethics.
Highlights
In Japan, the focus of pharmacist work has shifted from solely dispensing drugs to include communication with patients
The third category was labeled because this category describes ethical issues encountered when conducting research
Of the other two categories, is positioned in the middle, while is at the top. has three subcategories: {Researcher-centered research}, {Participant/patient-centered research}, and {Research that enters into regular work}
Summary
In Japan, the focus of pharmacist work has shifted from solely dispensing drugs to include communication with patients. All clinical research in Japan must comply with the relevant laws and ethical standards [1,2]. These rules include ethical considerations for participants. It is important to understand the perception of research ethics, including the general ethical passivity of community pharmacists; this makes it possible to build an educational program that suits their actual situation. The authors of this study have been developing a learner-driven educational program that links knowledge of research ethics to practice. As part of this project, we conducted an opinion survey among community pharmacists
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
