Abstract

AbstractUsing Juno‐measured >30 keV electrons, three regions with substantial ultraviolet emissions were identified previously for Jupiter's main aurora (excluding the polar cap): low‐latitude diffuse aurora, mid‐latitude Zone I of downward acceleration, and higher latitude Zone II of bi‐directional acceleration. Zone I, associated with upward magnetic field‐aligned currents, was represented as bimodal: sometimes supporting coherent downward electron electrostatic acceleration and sometimes downward electron broadband acceleration, with broadband acceleration usually delivering the most intense electron energy flux at Juno. Recent observations of up‐going ion beams within Zone I represent a challenge as to whether coherent electrostatic acceleration invariably accompanies broadband acceleration. Is this region strictly bi‐modal, or is there a continuum between these two modes? We address these questions by combining multiple ion and electron data sources to diagnose electrostatic potentials both above and below the spacecraft. We find: (a) During Zone I downward electron broadband events, there are examples where evidence of downward electron electrostatic acceleration completely disappears and examples where it endures at some level. (b) Most often, evidence of downward electron electrostatic acceleration is strongly suppressed with strong downward electron broadband acceleration. Residual potentials most often (not always) have values small (<10 kV) compared to the electron characteristic energies of 100–400 keV. (c) Care must be exercised in these studies because plasmasheet electron precipitation spectra can mimic broadband acceleration spectra. At least for weaker auroral broadband accelerations, there is likely to be a continuum of electrostatic and broadband participation. Why either process is favored at any one time is unknown.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call