Abstract

Since the announcement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the need for localization of SDGs has been emphasized. In this context, sustainable rural development is still a relatively undescribed area in the context of using the participatory budget as a tool to implement SDGs. Few countries have introduced legal regulations in practice, enabling the creation of participatory budgets (especially in rural areas), so a multifaceted analysis of a decade of Poland's experience may provide important guidelines for countries considering introducing such solutions, which we consider to be the main purpose of this study. This is the first study covering all communes where participatory budgets (Solecki Fund—FS) were created in Poland during the 2010–2018 period (up to 60% of all), covering both the analysis of the process of creating FSs, the directions of spending and the scale of spending (including regional differentiation), as well as legal regulations and the consequences of including central government support in this mechanism. On the basis of the research, it can be observed that, despite the small scale of FS spending, the number of municipalities using this form of citizen participation is increasing. At the same time, there is significant variation between regions, which indicates the flexibility of the FSs in adapting to the needs reported by residents. The analysed directions of expenditure indicate that the FSs are in line with the SDG objectives related to the improvement of residents' quality of life. It can be concluded that, despite the existing legal regulations, the introduction of the Solecki Fund undoubtedly depends on the political will of the local government's legislative authorities and the willingness of residents to participate in decisions on spending directions.

Highlights

  • The issue of development in rural areas is quite frequently touched upon in literature

  • Woods [14] (p. 2) states that one of the main challenges currently faced by rural social scientists seem to be the issues around the sustainable use of resources; the resilience of rural communities to environmental uncertainties; challenges arising from the intensification and reconfiguration of global mobility patterns; critical analysis of the political economies of new strategies for rural economic development based on the sustainable use and management of environmental resources; the redrawing of the contours of state intervention in rural societies and economies including the potential rationalisation of expensive rural public services; and reevaluation of state support for agriculture, conservation, and community development in the context of economic austerity

  • Solecki Fund (FS) can be considered as a rare form of rural area's inhabitants' public participation, and this paper aims to discuss critical issues connected with the FS application in Poland in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and sustainable rural development (SRD) context

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The issue of development in rural areas is quite frequently touched upon in literature. In The Cork 2.0 Declaration [4] (A Better Life in Rural Areas) the countries of the European Union emphasized “the need to ensure that rural areas and communities (countryside, farms, villages, and small towns) remain attractive places to live and work by improving access to services and opportunities” In this context, it can be said that one of the determinants of rural development is the improvement in quality of life in these regions. Solecki Fund (FS) can be considered as a rare (worldwide) form of rural area's inhabitants' public participation, and this paper aims to discuss critical issues connected with the FS application in Poland in the SDG and SRD context Such analysis can contribute to a worldwide discussion on the impact of participatory budgeting influence on sustainable rural development. The conducted study, apart from explaining the conditions of evolution and use of rural participatory mechanism in the approach to public participation and sustainable development, contributes to the determination of the possibilities and limitations of adapting these actions into the practical implementation of the SRD concept

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call