Housing Performance and the Electorate

Abstract

The electorate is concerned with personal financial and macroeconomic conditions in addition to policy issues and tends to hold the incumbent party accountable when voting. The performance of the United States’ largest asset class, residential real estate, should influence individual voter behavior. According to economic voting theory and the “homevoter” hypothesis, homeowners will be more supportive of policies that are perceived as beneficial to their property value. We investigate this relationship in the US residential real estate market by evaluating the effects of heterogenous county-level housing market performance on voter behavior in national presidential elections and find counties with superior house price performance in the four years preceding an election are more likely to “vote-switch” to the incumbent party. Counties with relatively inferior house price performance in the four years leading up to the election are more likely to switch their vote from the incumbent to the challenging party. The relationship is strongest in the years closest to an election and in counties that rank in the higher quartile of housing price performance. Election outcomes in “swing” counties are particularly vulnerable the local real estate economy. To our knowledge, this is the first study to link heterogeneous local residential real estate performance over a series of national election outcomes.