Abstract

In this paper, the constitutive equation parameters (Johnson–Cook parameters) of the 33MnCrB5 material were determined with the help of tensile tests. Initially, Johnson–Cook (JC) model was used for performing the simulations of the sample with finite element analysis with the help of ANSYS software. For these operations, the sample was first used at a certain temperature (24 °C) and low strain rates (10−1, 10−2, 10−3 s−1) and quasi-static tensile tests were performed. Then, high temperature tensile tests were performed with strain rate values of 10−3 s−1 at temperatures of 300 °C, 600 °C, and 900 °C, respectively. Finally, JC parameters belonging to test materials were found in accordance with the results obtained from the high temperature tensile and quasi-static tests. In the last stage, the results obtained from the simulation software for the yield stress, maximum stress, and elongation values were compared with the experimental results. As a result, deviation values for quasi-static tests are calculated as 5.04% at yield stress, 5.57% at maximum stress, and 5.68% at elongation, while for high temperature, yield stress is 9.42%, maximum stress is 11.49% and the elongation value is 7.63%. The accuracy of JC parameters was verified with the comparison made with the obtained data.

Highlights

  • 33MnCrB5 steel is achieved by adding a small amount of boron to medium carbon steels

  • The constants (A, B, and n) used in the equation are found from the stress–strain curve obtained at the reference strain rate and room temperature

  • The yield stress value determined for room temperature and reference strain rate (24 °C and 10-3 s-1) according to the test

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The only method used in the production of open sections of steel parts with very high strength value is the hot forging process of boron steels [6, 7]. The application of finite element tensile and compression test simulation tools have been increased because experimental investigations take a long time and have a significant cost of implementation[8, 9]. For this reason, modeling of plastic deformation processes with the finite element (FE) method offers an alternative method [10,11,12,13,14].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call