Abstract

Animals can indirectly gather meaningful information about other individuals by eavesdropping on their third-party interactions. In particular, eavesdropping can be used to indirectly attribute a negative or positive valence to an individual and to adjust one's future behavior towards that individual. Few studies have focused on this ability in nonhuman animals, especially in nonprimate species. Here, we investigated this ability for the first time in domestic horses (Equus caballus) by projecting videos of positive and negative interactions between an unknown human experimenter (a "positive" experimenter or a "negative" experimenter) and an actor horse. The horses reacted emotionally while watching the videos, expressing behavioral (facial expressions and contact-seeking behavior) and physiological (heart rate) cues of positive emotions while watching the positive video and of negative emotions while watching the negative video. This result shows that the horses perceived the content of the videos and suggests an emotional contagion between the actor horse and the subjects. After the videos were projected, the horses took a choice test, facing the positive and negative experimenters in real life. The horses successfully used the interactions seen in the videos to discriminate between the experimenters. They touched the negative experimenter significantly more, which seems counterintuitive but can be interpreted as an appeasement attempt, based on the existing literature. This result suggests that horses can indirectly attribute a valence to a human experimenter by eavesdropping on a previous third-party interaction with a conspecific.

Highlights

  • Social animals can indirectly gather meaningful information from other individuals by eavesdropping on their third-party interactions (i.e., “social eavesdropping”; Bonnie and Earley2007)

  • The scores on factor 2 tended to differ between the two videos: the horses tended to score higher while watching the negative video than while watching the positive video (V= 215, P= 0.065)

  • In accordance with our hypothesis, our results show that the horses reacted differently when watching a positive video and a negative video and that the information observed in these videos later influenced their behavior towards the two experimenters in a choice test in real life

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social animals can indirectly gather meaningful information from other individuals by eavesdropping on their third-party interactions (i.e., “social eavesdropping”; Bonnie and Earley2007). Animals can indirectly attribute a valence to unknown individuals based on how the individuals behaved towards a third party and to use this information to adjust their own behavior towards the individuals This latter ability has been investigated in a few non-human species, including great apes, capuchin and marmoset monkeys, domestic dogs and reef fish (see Abdai and Miklósi 2016 for a review). A similar ability has been studied in reef fish species in the context of interspecific mutualism with the cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus): reef fish were shown to eavesdrop on the interaction between these cleaner fishes and other third-party clients in order to select cooperative partners (that remove the ectoparasites from clients’ mouths and do not cheat by eating the clients’ mucus; Bshary and Grutter 2006) This underlies the importance of carrying out studies in taxa other than dogs and primates in order to know how widespread this ability to attribute a valence based on social eavesdropping is

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call