Abstract

Remittances—money sent back by migrants to their place of origin—are considered to be both economic and social practices mapping out a transnational space of migration. By sending and receiving money, objects, ideas, and social norms, migrants and non-migrants strengthen their social ties and express their multiple belongings. Remittances can thus be read as a practice of multi-local participation and inclusion. When remittance develops a negative trend, the remittance decay hypothesis thus concludes a shift in belonging: The longer migrants stay in their host country and build a life there, the less they remit. In this article, the remittance decay hypothesis is tested with ethnographic data from interviews and participant observation in the migration nexus between Uşak, Turkey, and Fulpmes, Austria. Remittance to Turkey has declined markedly in the last two decades from a record high of 574 USD million in September 1998 to a record low of 11 USD million in August 2019. Ethnographic data with members of three generations of Turkish-Austrians in Fulpmes can help to explain this process from a diachronic perspective: for changing remittance practices and a transformation in remittance scripts, e.g., as investment, compensation, help, gift or charity donation, demonstrate that there is more to the story than a fading sense of belonging.

Highlights

  • Remittances—money sent back by migrants to their place of origin—are considered to be economic and social practices indicating transnational networks between senders and recipients

  • The development of remittances sent to Turkey follows the negative trend of the remittance decay hypothesis

  • Ethnographic studies show that when it comes to remittances, “economics is not the whole story” (Levitt & Lamba-Nieves, 2011, p. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Remittances—money sent back by migrants to their place of origin—are considered to be economic and social practices indicating transnational networks between senders and recipients. The remittance money is earmarked as multi-sited acts of solidarity, expressions of nostalgia, social glue, or powerful tools of controlling a network one has left behind. As such, they reflect individual commitments, priorities, and difficult decisions in transnational biographies The decision to become mobile is in most cases connected to the hope of financial advancement, access to work, prosperity, and security: a decision not always made individually, but by families and villages. The gains of mobility are shared between the place of destination, the place of origin, and beyond, for transnational lives bridge host and home countries, but spread out to other family locations and workplaces

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call