Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective The COVID-19 pandemic strained the healthcare system and the WHO recently reported increased rates of antibiotic resistance. Meanwhile, antiretroviral resistance can also lead to treatment failure and disease progression, especially in HIV patients. Here, we investigated the rates of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in our HIV population between pre and post-COVID-19 eras. Methods/Case Report The post-COVID-19 era began on 03/11/2020. Patients positive for HIV-1 between 01/2019- 08/2021 were included (total: 94 patients, 46 pre-COVID-19; 48 post-COVID-19). Patients’ charts were reviewed for demographics, laboratory results (including HIV-1 sequencing/genotyping (e.g., Genosure)), clinical presentation and management. Student t-test and Fisher exact test were calculated. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Most patients were male (70%) and had a mean age of 49 years. 70% of patients had sufficient viral loads in samples reflexed to HIV genotyping. Post-COVID-19 patients harbored lower viral loads (1.8x105 vs. 3.4x105 copies/mL, p=0.05), CD4 counts (174 vs. 196 cells/mcL, p=0.7), CD8 counts (555 vs. 800 cells/mcL, p=0.04), and higher CD4/CD8 ratio (0.312 vs. 0.266, p=0.57). Overall, 20% of patients had HIVDR. Following COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 9% increase in HIVDR, predominantly seen in non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), although insignificant. Specifically, high resistance was documented for drugs Efavirenz (16%), Nevirapine (16%), and Rilpivirine (13%). We observed an increased prevalence of G190A, K101, K103, and E138 mutations conferring resistance to NNRTIs. Changes to therapy were observed in 47.8% (42/88) of total cases, with an increase of 12.5% in patients from post-COVID-19 era. Additionally, changes to therapy were observed more in patients with infectious diseases consultation (16% increase). Conclusion Increasing HIVDR was seen in our patient population post-COVID-19. Continued surveillance is critical to managing HIVDR and improving patient outcomes. The clinical utility of sequencing tests can outweigh the cost if results are appropriately acted upon which may involve the participation of other clinical teams and the antimicrobial stewardship committee.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call