Abstract

Even though the Anti-Hetman uprising (November-December of 1918) was a short-term and brief military conflict nevertheless, it had a significant impact on the course of the Ukrainian revolution and gained some place in historiography. A characteristic feature of historiography dedicated to the Ukrainian revolution is that part was created by Ukrainian political emigration abroad (in the atmosphere of ideological discussion between different Ukrainian parties), and another part – in the Soviet Union under the pressure of censorship and communist ideology. Accordingly, the depiction of events of the Ukrainian Revolution both in the home country and abroad is significantly ideologized. This is also due to the Anti-Hetman uprising (November-December of 1918). The depiction of this event in historiography throughout the 20th century serves as a notable illustration of how historical narratives can be used as instruments in political and ideological struggles, and in turn, demonstrates how political contention influences the formation of scholarly historical literature.The article highlights and provides an overview of the various perspectives on the Anti-Hetman Uprising in domestic historiography from the conclusion of the conflict until 1991. It examines the evolution and changes in these perspectives throughout the mentioned period. The article also sheds light on the major shifts and trends in approaches to studying this event during different periods of the 20th century. It analyzes the role and influence of political factors in shaping the historical narrative regarding the Anti-Hetman Uprising, as well as identifies the interplay between the political context of the time and historiographical debates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call