Abstract

Abstract. Crop water productivity is a key element of water and food security in the world and can be quantified by the water footprint (WF). Previous studies have looked at the spatially explicit distribution of crop WFs, but little is known about their temporal dynamics. Here, we present AquaCrop-Earth@lternatives (ACEA), a new process-based global gridded crop model that can simulate three consumptive WF components: green (WFg), blue from irrigation (WFbi), and blue from capillary rise (WFbc). The model is applied to analyse global maize production in 1986–2016 at 5×5 arcmin spatial resolution. Our results show that over the 2012–2016 period, the global average unit WF of maize is 728.0 m3 t−1 yr−1 (91.2 % WFg, 7.6 % WFbi, and 1.2 % WFbc), with values varying greatly around the world. Regions with high-input agriculture (e.g. Western Europe and Northern America) show small unit WFs and low interannual variability, while low-input regions show opposite outcomes (e.g. Middle and Eastern Africa). From 1986 to 2016, the global average unit WF reduced by a third, mainly due to the historical increase in maize yields. However, due to the rapid expansion of rainfed and irrigated areas, the global WF of maize production increased by half, peaking at 768.3×109 m3 yr−1 in 2016. As many regions still have a high potential in closing yield gaps, unit WFs are likely to reduce further. Simultaneously, humanity's rising demand for food and biofuels may further expand maize areas and hence increase WFs of production. Thus, it is important to address the sustainability and purpose of maize production, especially in those regions where it might endanger ecosystems and human livelihoods.

Highlights

  • Ever-increasing crop production is one of the reasons why humanity transgresses planetary boundaries (Campbell et al, 2017; Jaramillo and Destouni, 2015)

  • Rainfed systems produce 76.5 % of maize and show on average a 10.5 % larger unit water footprint (WF) (744.9 m3 t−1 yr−1) than irrigated systems (674.1 m3 t−1 yr−1). Both the smallest and the largest regional unit WFs are located in areas dominated by rainfed production, with the largest one in Middle Africa (3157.9 m3 t−1 yr−1) and the smallest one in Western Europe (433.2 m3 t−1 yr−1)

  • ACEA is a new process-based crop model that allows for the assessment of green and blue crop water productivity at large spatial scales, which we demonstrate by simulating global maize WFs over the 1986–2016 period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ever-increasing crop production is one of the reasons why humanity transgresses planetary boundaries (Campbell et al, 2017; Jaramillo and Destouni, 2015). One way to minimise crops’ pressure on water resources is to increase crop water productivity, i.e. have “more crop per drop” (Giordano et al, 2006). The volume of water needed to produce a unit of a crop can be measured by the consumptive water footprint (WF). It is calculated as the crop water use (CWU) over crop yield (Hoekstra, 2011). CWU reflects the amount of accumulated evapotranspiration (ET) over the growing season and can be attributed to green (from precipitation) and blue water (from capillary rise – CR – and irrigation). Crop yield reflects the harvestable part of crop biomass

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call