Abstract
Crop water productivity is a key element of water and food security in the world and can be quantified by the water footprint (WF). Previous studies have looked at the spatially explicit distribution of crop WFs but little is known about the temporal dynamics. We develop a new global gridded crop model – AquaCrop-Earth@lternatives (ACEA) – that can simulate three consumptive WF components: green (WFg), blue from irrigation (WFbi), and blue from capillary rise (WFbc) at high temporal and spatial resolutions. The model is applied to analyse global maize production during 1986–2016 at 5 × 5 arc minute grid. Our results show that in 2012–2016, the global average unit WF of maize is 723.2 m3 t−1 y−1 (89.5 % WFg, 8.3 % WFbi, 2.2 % WFbc) with values varying greatly around the world. Regions characterised by high agricultural development generally show a small unit WF and its interannual variation, such as Western Europe and Northern America (WF < 500 m3 t−1 y−1, CV < 15 %). On the contrary, regions with low agricultural development show opposite outcomes, such as Middle and Eastern Africa (WF > 2500 m3 t−1 y−1, CV > 40 %). Since 1986, the global unit WF of maize has reduced by 34.6 % mainly due to the historical decrease in yield gaps. However, due to the rapid expansion of rainfed and irrigated cropland, the global WF of maize production has increased by 48.8 % peaking at 762.9 × 109 m3 y−1 in 2016. As many regions still have a high potential in decreasing yield gaps, the unit WF of maize is likely to continue reducing, whereas the WF of maize production is likely to continue growing as humanity’s rising appetite can lead to further cropland expansion. The simulation of other crops with ACEA is necessary to assess the pressure of overall crop production on ecosystems and freshwater resources worldwide.
Highlights
We develop a new global gridded crop model – AquaCrop-Earth@lternatives (ACEA) – that can simulate three consumptive water footprint (WF) components: green (WFg), blue from irrigation (WFbi), and blue from capillary rise (WFbc) at high temporal and spatial resolutions
The methods used to estimate the green and blue WFs in these studies can be improved in various aspects: (i) they apply a crop water requirement approach which does not simulate crop growth and its 45 response to abiotic stresses; (ii) the water balance is simulated without considering capillary rise that can be quite relevant in areas with shallow groundwater (Hoekstra et al, 2012a); (iii) greenblue water separation is performed in post-processing rather than tracing it directly during the modelling, which leads to the lower accuracy of WF estimates (Hoekstra, 2019)
This study introduces a new process-based global gridded crop model – AquaCrop-Earth@lternatives (ACEA) – that can simulate crop water productivity at high spatial and temporal resolutions
Summary
25 The ever-increasing demand for crops pushes humanity towards the environmental limits of our planet (Campbell et al., 2017; Jaramillo and Destouni, 2015). The methods used to estimate the green and blue WFs in these studies can be improved in various aspects: (i) they apply a crop water requirement approach which does not simulate crop growth and its 45 response to abiotic stresses (e.g. from extreme temperatures or water deficits); (ii) the water balance is simulated without considering capillary rise that can be quite relevant in areas with shallow groundwater (Hoekstra et al, 2012a); (iii) greenblue water separation is performed in post-processing rather than tracing it directly during the modelling, which leads to the lower accuracy of WF estimates (Hoekstra, 2019) To these studies, crop WFs can be calculated at high spatial and temporal resolutions with process-based global gridded crop models (GGCMs). Global crop WFs have never been studied with GGCMs
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.