Abstract

Large bone defects are a major problem in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Tissue engineering based treatments have emerged as promising alternatives to traditional bone grafting techniques. Critical size bone defect animal models have been developed and widely used to evaluate and compare therapeutic effectiveness in bone tissue engineering treatments. To measure healing in a given defect after treatment, histological assessment methods are commonly used. These histological methods are typically qualitative and only measure the amount of newly formed bone. In this study, we introduce a new histological scoring method that in addition to new bone formation also measures newly formed "cartilage," "fibrous tissue," and "remnant bone defect size." Using Kappa analysis and interclass correlation analysis, we verified the reliability of our new scoring method. These additional parameters make it possible to differentiate between the hard callus and soft callus phases of healing and, thus, derive more valuable information about the effect different tissue-engineering treatments have on the healing process.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call