Abstract

The limited options for bone repair have led to an extensive research of the field and the development of alloplastic and xenogeneic grafts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone repair with two bone substitutes: deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (BCP) in critical-size defect. A total of 8-mm defects were made in the parietal bones of rabbits (n=12). The animals were divided into three experimental groups: sham (defect filled with a blood clot), DBB (defect filled with DBB), and BCP (defect filled with BCP). After the experimental periods of 15 and 45 days, the animals were euthanized and submitted to histomorphometric analysis. The total defect area, mineralized tissue area, biomaterial area, and soft tissue area were evaluated. A greater amount of immature bone tissue and biomaterial particles were observed in the BCP group compared to DBB and sham at 45 days (p<0.05). There was no difference in the qualitative pattern of bone deposition between DBB and BCP. However, the sham group did not show osteoid islands along with the defect, presenting a greater amount of collagen fibers as well in relation to the DBB and BCP groups. There was a greater number of inflammatory cells in the DBB at 45 days compared to BCP and sham groups. In conclusion, BCP and DBB are options for optimizing the use of bone grafts for maxillofacial rehabilitation. Bone defects treated with BCP showed greater deposition of bone tissue at 45 days.

Highlights

  • Biomaterials have been widely used for the rehabilitation of large bone defects due to trauma, tumor resection, or long-term tooth loss

  • After 15 and 45 days, there was an increase in the amount of immature bone inside the defect in the biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (BCP) group compared to the deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) group

  • The presence of biomaterial was observed in the DBB and BCP groups in both experimental periods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biomaterials have been widely used for the rehabilitation of large bone defects due to trauma, tumor resection, or long-term tooth loss. According to their origin, biomaterials can be classified as autogenous, allogeneic, xenogenous, and alloplastic [1]. Xenogenous grafts are widely used biomaterials with high success rates [7,8,9] These biomaterials do not cause an immune response and are considered biocompatible. One of these materials is the BioOss® (Geistlich-Pharma, Wolhusen, Switzerland), consisting of calcium carbonate apatite. The material is slowly reabsorbed, and its residues can be found nine years after grafting [6,10]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call