Abstract

Two-stage revision is considered the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). During the interim period, between explantation of the infected hip endoprosthesis and revision arthroplasty, individually formed articulating hip spacers made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement can be used to provide better soft tissue preservation, local antibiotic release, and improved postoperative mobilization. If effective prevention from luxation is achieved, hip function and hence overall patient satisfaction is improved. Zirconium oxide particles inside conventional PMMA bone cement, however, are known to enhance third-body wear, which may cause alterations of the metal head in the articulating spacer and hence become a serious risk for the patient. Therefore, the aim of our study was to analyze whether the articular surface of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads is significantly altered in the setting of a metal-on-cement articulation during the interim period of two-stage revision for PJI. We analyzed a consecutive series of 23 spacer cases and compared them with femoral heads from two series of conventional hip arthroplasty revisions with metal-on-polyethylene articulations and different time intervals in situ. To investigate metallic wear, the femoral heads were thoroughly examined, and their surface roughness was measured and analyzed. We found no significant differences between the two conventional hip arthroplasty groups, despite their very different times in situ. Furthermore, the individually different times in situ within the spacer group had no significant impact on surface roughness, either. Compared with the spacer group, the surface roughness of the metal femoral heads from both conventional hip arthroplasty groups were even higher. Within the spacer group, roughness parameters did not show significant differences regarding the five predefined locations on the metal head. We conclude that metal-on-cement articulations do not cause enhanced surface alterations of the metal femoral head and hence do not limit the application in articulating hip spacers in the setting of two-stage revision for PJI.

Highlights

  • Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a dreaded complication of total joint replacement that brings numerous challenges to the affected patients and the orthopedic surgeons

  • The aim of the current study was to analyze whether the articular surface of the metal (CoCr) femoral head is altered in the setting of a metal-on-cement articulation

  • We further looked forData correlations between roughness parameters within the spacer group and

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a dreaded complication of total joint replacement that brings numerous challenges to the affected patients and the orthopedic surgeons. One-stage revision has recently gained more support because of its good clinical results and numerous advantages in carefully selected patients. A widely accepted consensus was reached on several strict exclusion criteria such as unknown or multiresistant organism-based infections, relevant comorbidities, sinus tract, and other relevant soft tissue complications [1,2,3]. Two-stage revision is still widely considered the gold standard treatment in the setting of chronic and complex periprosthetic joint infections. Insall et al first described this technique in 1983 [4]. Numerous studies have reported that two-stage revision has been used successfully and can result in infection eradication rates beyond

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call