Abstract

This paper provides a Distributed Morphology (DM) analysis for Hindi nominal (noun and adjectival) inflection. Contra Singh & Sarma (2010), I argue that nominal suffixes contain two morphemes – a basic morpheme, and a restrictedly distributed additional morpheme. The presence of two different morphemes is especially evident when one compares noun and adjectival inflectional suffixes, which Singh & Sarma (2010) do not, since they only look at noun inflection. I also show that the so-called adjectival inflectional suffixes are not limited to adjectives, and may occur on nouns, provided the noun is not at the right edge of the noun phrase. On the other hand, the regular noun inflection is only limited to nouns at the right edge of the noun phrase. This is demonstrated using a type of coordinative compound found in Hindi. Then, I take the fact that nouns can take either the regular noun inflection or the so-called “adjectival” inflection as motivation for a unified analysis for both sets of suffixes. I demonstrate that after undoing certain phonological rules, the difference between the “adjectival” and regular noun inflectional suffixes can be summarized by saying that the additional morpheme only surfaces in the regular noun inflectional suffixes. Finally, I provide vocabulary entries and morphological operations that can capture the facts about the distribution of the various basic and additional morphemes.

Highlights

  • Hindi nominals inflect for case, number and gender

  • The reason that the additional morpheme is only found at the right edge of a noun phrase is because entries (17)-(19) are restricted to contexts where the [plural] node is immediately followed by the D head

  • We are able to account for the distribution of additional morphemes in the Hindi nominal suffix paradigms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hindi nominals (nouns and adjectives) inflect for case, number and gender. In this paper, I argue that these nominal inflectional suffixes contain up to two morphemes. The current analysis differs from S&S’s in claiming that Hindi noun inflectional suffixes can contain up to two morphemes. This difference arises partially (but not entirely) because there are certain segments that S&S treat as part of the noun, that I argue should be treated as part of the inflectional suffix. The -i is better analyzed as an inflectional morpheme This will be especially evident when we look at the adjectival inflection paradigm, which S&S do not consider. All nouns and adjectives belong to two inflectional classes, which I will call Class I and Class II These classes correspond to the two classes that Shapiro (1989) posits for Hindi nouns.

Masculine Class D Class E
Class II
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.