Abstract

Abstract. Cassiterite (SnO2) is the most common ore phase of Sn. Typically containing 1–100 µg g−1 of uranium and relatively low concentrations of common Pb, cassiterite has been increasingly targeted for U–Pb geochronology, principally via microbeam methods, to understand the timing and durations of granite-related magmatic–hydrothermal systems throughout geological time. However, due to the extreme resistance of cassiterite to most forms of acid digestion, there has been no published method permitting the complete, closed-system decomposition of cassiterite under conditions in which the basic necessities of measurement by isotope dilution can be met, leading to a paucity of reference and validation materials. To address this a new low blank (< 1 pg Pb) method for the complete acid decomposition of cassiterite utilising HBr in the presence of a mixed U–Pb tracer, U and Pb purification, and thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (TIMS) analyses has been developed. Decomposition rates have been experimentally evaluated under a range of conditions. A careful balance of time and temperature is required due to competing effects (e.g. HBr oxidation), yet the decomposition of 500 µm diameter fragments of cassiterite is readily achievable over periods comparable to zircon decomposition. Its acid-resistant nature can be turned into an advantage by leaching common Pb-bearing phases (e.g. sulfides, silicates) without disturbing the U–Pb systematics of the cassiterite lattice. The archetypal Sn–W greisen deposit of Cligga Head, SW England, is used to define accuracy relative to chemical abrasion–isotope dilution–thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) zircon U–Pb ages and demonstrates the potential of this new method for resolving high-resolution timescales (<0.1 %) of magmatic–hydrothermal systems. However, data also indicate that the isotopic composition of initial common Pb varies significantly, both between crystals and within a single crystal. This is attributed to significant fluid–rock interactions and the highly F-rich acidic nature of the hydrothermal system. At microbeam precision levels, this issue is largely unresolvable and can result in significant inaccuracy in interpreted ages. The ID-TIMS U–Pb method described herein can, for the first time, be used to properly characterise suitable reference materials for microbeam cassiterite U–Pb analyses, thus improving the accuracy of the U–Pb cassiterite chronometer as a whole.

Highlights

  • Cassiterite (SnO2) is the primary tin ore, precipitated from magmatic–hydrothermal fluids exsolved in association with reduced granitic systems and pegmatite bodies

  • Research into cassiterite U–Pb geochronology paused for some time due to the questionable accuracy of the first published results (McNaughton et al, 1993) and the difficulty in the hydrothermal decomposition of cassiterite required for isotope dilution methods due to the extremely acid-resistant nature of cassiterite (Gulson and Jones, 1992; Neymark et al, 2018)

  • This study demonstrates the potential of cassiterite decomposition with concentrated HBr to fulfil the necessary criteria for routine ID-thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (TIMS) cassiterite U–Pb geochronology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cassiterite (SnO2) is the primary tin ore, precipitated from magmatic–hydrothermal fluids exsolved in association with reduced granitic systems and pegmatite bodies. The potential of cassiterite as a U–Pb geochronometer to understand the timing of magmatic–hydrothermal Sn deposits, and their many associated elements critical for modern technology, e.g. Li, W, Nb and Ta, has long been recognised since the first reported isotope dilution–thermal ionisation mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS) U–Pb analyses With the advent of microbeam techniques, cassiterite U–Pb geochronology has become widely accessible Techniques such as laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) and ion microprobe (Carr et al, 2017) offer a rapid solution to analysing the U–Pb systematics of cassiterite without the direct need for dissolving a sample. Higher-temporal-resolution questions, such as those that begin to address processes on magmatic timescales, require a refinement of these uncertainties For microbeam techniques this may result from the refined standardisation of the methodology and identification of systematic uncertainties identified over long-term analysis using well-characterised reference materials (RMs)(Horstwood et al, 2016)

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.