Abstract

The increasing prevalence of high‐severity wildfire in forests in the US state of California is connected to past forest management, but uncertainty remains regarding the differential effects of land ownership on these trends. To determine whether differing forest management regimes, inferred from land ownership, influence high‐severity fire incidence, we assembled and analyzed a large dataset of 154 wildfires that burned a combined area of more than 971,000 ha in California. We found that where fires occurred, the odds of high‐severity fire on “private industrial” lands were 1.8 times greater than on “public” lands and 1.9 times greater than on “other” lands (that is, remaining lands classified as neither private industrial nor public). Moreover, high‐severity fire incidence was greater in areas adjacent to private industrial land, indicating this trend extends across ownership boundaries. Overall, these results indicate that prevailing forest management practices on private industrial timberland may increase high‐severity fire occurrence, underscoring the need for cross‐boundary cooperation to protect ecological and social systems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call