Abstract

Neutron diffraction texture measurements provide bulk averaged textures with excellent grain orientation statistics, even for large-grained materials, owing to the probed volume being of the order of 1 cm3. Furthermore, crystallographic parameters and other valuable microstructure information such as phase fraction, coherent crystallite size, root-mean-square microstrain, macroscopic or intergranular strain and stress, etc. can be derived from neutron diffractograms. A procedure for combined high stereographic resolution texture and residual stress evaluation was established on the pulsed-neutron-source-based engineering materials diffractometer TAKUMI at the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility of the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Center, through division of the neutron detector panel regions. Pole figure evaluation of a limestone standard sample with a well known texture suggested that the precision obtained for texture measurement is comparable to that of the established neutron beamlines utilized for texture measurement, such as the HIPPO diffractometer at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (New Mexico, USA) and the D20 angle-dispersive neutron diffractometer at the Institut Laue-Langevin (Grenoble, France). A high-strength martensite-austenite multilayered steel was employed for further verification of the reliability of simultaneous Rietveld analysis of multiphase textures and macro stress tensors. By using a texture-weighted geometric mean micromechanical (BulkPathGEO) model, a macro stress tensor analysis with a plane stress assumption showed a rolling direction-transverse direction (RD-TD) in-plane compressive stress (about -330 MPa) in the martensite layers and an RD-TD in-plane tensile stress (about 320 MPa) in the austenite layers. The phase stress partitioning was ascribed mainly to the additive effect of the volume expansion during martensite transformation and the linear contraction misfit between austenite layers and newly transformed martensite layers during the water quenching process.

Highlights

  • Neutron diffraction is widely used as an accurate probe for materials texture evaluation because its large spot size and high penetration compared with X-ray and electron diffraction enable the acquisition of orientation information from a polycrystalline bulk sample averaged over a volume of the order of 1 cm3

  • Precise texture measurement using neutron diffraction is essential to carry out reliable macro stress tensor evaluation, even though an uncertain shear strain field exists in these textured materials

  • An approach for combined analysis of high stereographic resolution texture and residual stress was established for the TAKUMI engineering materials neutron diffractometer through appropriate division of the neutron panel regions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neutron diffraction is widely used as an accurate probe for materials texture evaluation because its large spot size and high penetration compared with X-ray and electron diffraction enable the acquisition of orientation information from a polycrystalline bulk sample averaged over a volume of the order of 1 cm. Crystallographic information, e.g. atomic positions, lattice parameters, phase fractions, and strains or stresses, can be obtained simultaneously. The excellent reliability of neutron texture analysis was confirmed by a. 51, 746–760 research papers round-robin experiment (Wenk, 1991). Utilizing the high penetrability of neutrons into many structural materials, various sample environments can be constructed to carry out in situ texture evaluations (Wenk & Van Houtte, 2004)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call