Abstract

The detection and classification of subsurface improvised explosive devices (IEDs) remains one of the most pressing military and civilian problems worldwide. These IEDs are often intentionally made with either very small metallic parts or less-conducting parts in order to evade low-frequency electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors, or metal detectors, which operate at frequencies of 50 kHz or less. Recently, high-frequency electromagnetic induction (HFEMI), which extends the established EMI frequency range above 50 kHz to 20 MHz and bridges the gap between EMI and ground-penetrating radar frequencies, has shown promising results related to detecting and identifying IEDs. In this higher frequency range, less-conductive targets display signature inphase and quadrature responses similar to higher conducting targets in the LFEMI range. IED constituent parts, such as carbon rods, small pressure plates, conductivity voids, low metal content mines, and short wires respond to HFEMI but not to traditional low-frequency EMI (LFEMI). Results from recent testing over mock-ups of less-conductive IEDs or their components show distinctive HFEMI responses, suggesting that this new sensing realm could augment the detection and discrimination capability of established EMI technology. In this paper, we present results of using the HFEMI sensor over IED-like targets at the Fort AP Hill test site. We show that results agree with numerical modeling thus providing motives to incorporate sensing at these frequencies into traditional EMI and/or GPR-based sensors.

Highlights

  • Interrogation of the subsurface using electromagnetics is desirable for the fundamental reason that the ground does not have to be disturbed during interrogation

  • The measurement procedure for the high-frequency electromagnetic induction (HFEMI) sensor is similar in concept to infrared emission spectroscopy (IRES) in that three measurements are required in the data acquisition process

  • The data shown agree well with data acquired with low-frequency electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensors, displaying a quadrature peak and a high-frequency inductive limit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interrogation of the subsurface using electromagnetics is desirable for the fundamental reason that the ground does not have to be disturbed during interrogation. Among EM sensing modalities, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), operating from perhaps 50 or 100 MHz to the GHz range, has long been of interest for exploring the subsurface, whether for characterizing the medium or for identifying inclusions. These systems operate by transmitting electromagnetic waves into the ground, sometimes from multiple locations, and recording reflections over time and space. It is limited by a rapid decay in the transmitted fields of 1/r3 from the first term of the Hertzian dipole, but has the advantage of being able to treat the soil as if it were transparent in most cases [1,5,6,7,8,9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call