High Dominant Frequencies and Fractionated Potentials Do Not Indicate Focal or Rotational Activation During AF

Abstract

BackgroundDominant frequencies (DFs) or complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs), indicative of focal sources or rotational activation, are used to identify target sites for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in clinical studies, although the relationship among DF, CFAE, and activation patterns remains unclear. ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the relationship between patterns of activation underlying DF and CFAE sites during AF. MethodsEpicardial high-resolution mapping of the right and left atrium including Bachmann’s bundle was performed in 71 participants. We identified the highest dominant frequency (DFmax) and highest degree of CFAE (CFAEmax) with the use of existing clinical criteria and classified patterns of activation as focal or rotational activation and smooth propagation, conduction block (CB), collision and remnant activity, and fibrillation potentials as single, double, or fractionated potentials containing, respectively, 1, 2, or 3 or more negative deflections. Relationships among activation patterns, DFmax, and potential types were investigated. ResultsDFmax were primarily located at the left atrioventricular groove and did not harbor focal activation (proportion focal waves: 0% [IQR: 0%-2%]). Compared with non-DFmax sites, DFmax were characterized by more frequent smooth propagation (22% [IQR: 7%-48%] vs 17% [IQR: 11%-24%]; P = 0.001), less frequent conduction block (69% [IQR: 51%-81%] vs 74% [IQR: 69%-78%]; P = 0.006), a higher proportion of single potentials (72% [IQR: 55%-84%] vs 6%1 [IQR: 55%-65%]; P = 0.003), and a lower proportion of fractionated potentials (4% [IQR: 1%-11%] vs 12% [IQR: 9%-15%]; P = 0.004). CFAEmax were mainly found at the pulmonary veins area, and only 1% [IQR: 0%-2%] of all CFAEmax contained focal activation. Compared with non-CFAEmax sites, CFAEmax sites were characterized by less frequent smooth propagation (1% [IQR: 0%-1%] vs 17% [IQR: 12%-24%]; P < 0.001) and more frequent remnant activity (20% [IQR: 12%-29%] vs 8% [IQR: 5%-10%]; P < 0.001), and harbored predominantly fractionated potentials (52% [IQR: 43%-66%] vs 12% [IQR: 9%-14%]; P < 0.001). ConclusionsFocal or rotational patterns of activation were not consistently detected at DFmax domains and CFAEmax sites. These findings do not support the concept of targeting DFmax or CFAEmax according to existing criteria for AF ablation.