Abstract
This study assessed whether stratifying agricultural areas into macro- and micro-variability regions allows targeted sampling to better capture soil attribute variability, thus improving digital soil maps compared to regular grid sampling. Allocating more samples where soil variability is expected offers a promising alternative. We evaluated two sampling densities in two agricultural fields in Southeast Brazil: a sparse density (one sample per 2.5 hectares), typical in Precision Agriculture, and a denser grid (one sample per hectare), which usually provides reasonable mapping accuracy. For each density, we applied three designs: a regular grid and grids with 25% and 50% guided points. Apparent soil magnetic susceptibility (MSa) delimited macro-homogeneity zones, while Sentinel-2’s Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) identified micro-homogeneity, guiding sampling to pixels with higher Fuzzy membership. The attributes assessed included phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and clay content. Results showed that the 50% guided sample configuration improved ordinary kriging interpolation accuracy, particularly with sparse grids. In the six sparse grid scenarios, in four of them, the grid with 50% of the points in regular design and the other 50% directed by the proposed method presented better performance than the full regular grid; the higher improvement was obtained for clay content (RMSE of 54.93 g kg−1 to 45.63 g kg−1, a 16.93% improvement). However, prior knowledge of soil attributes and covariates is needed for this approach. We therefore recommend two-stage sampling to understand soil properties’ relationships with covariates before applying the proposed method.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call